barbri criminal procedure - matt capronbarbri.DOCVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Criminal Procedure Outline Exclusionary Rule (judge made doctrine) Prohibits the introduction of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment rights Illegally obtained evidence (e.g., coerced statement; items found in an illegal search) is inadmissible at trial, and all “fruit of the poisonous tree” (i.e., evidence obtained from exploitation of the illegally obtained evidence) must be excluded Exceptions to the “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine”: Evidence obtained from a source independent of the original illegality An intervening act of free will by the defendant that breaks the causal chain (e.g., defendant is illegally arrested but is released and later returns to the station to confess); and Inevitable Discovery (i.e., the prosecution can show that the police would have discovered the evidence regardless of the unconstitutional act) Limitations on the Exclusionary Rule Rule does not apply to grand juries (grand jury witnesses may be compelled to testify on illegally seized items), unless evidence was obtained in violation of the federal wiretapping statute Rules does not apply in civil proceedings Rule does not apply in parole revocation proceedings Rule does not apply when police act in good faith reliance on: Case law (e.g., an opinion that is later overturned); A facially valid statute or ordinance (later declared unconstitutional); A computer report containing clerical errors not made by the police; or A defective search warrant, unless: The underlying affidavit was so lacking in probable cause that it could not reasonably be relied on; The warrant was defective on its face (i.e., it failed to state with particularity the place to be searched and things to be seized); A cop or government officer (affiant) lied to or misled the magistrate; or The magistrate has “wholly abandoned his judicial role” Use of Excluded Evidence for Impeachment Purposes An otherwise voluntary confession taken in violation of the Miranda r

文档评论(0)

dsf80fhg0j + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档