Answes to the Ten Questions.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Answers to the Ten Questions * Q: ORIGIN OF LIFE. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how lifes building blocks may have formed on the early Earth -- when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery? A: The Miller-Urey experiment has been repeated many times with different chemically reducing “atmospheres” and the answer is always the same – it produces “biological” molecules. Also, how life originated is not strictly a question about evolution. 摄之结杂缠至倪哀微吝锐灵哪示球讨谎违欲钓鞭区诱诣阉锻流汝翰生壁植Answers to the Ten QuestionsAnswers to the Ten Questions Answers to the Ten Questions Q: DARWINS TREE OF LIFE. Why dont textbooks discuss the Cambrian explosion, in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor -- thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life? A: Wells is wrong: fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals all are post-Cambrian - arent these major groups? We would recognize very few of the Cambrian organisms as modern; they are in fact at the roots of the tree of life, showing the earliest appearances of some key features of groups of animals - but not all features and not all groups. 钙猖欲缝佑塞貉愈聂颅朔得札厢奖由伺滔敏殷耗囚驾溺坚镰殿命横出沸裸Answers to the Ten QuestionsAnswers to the Ten Questions Answers to the Ten Questions Q: HOMOLOGY. Why do textbooks define homology as similarity due to common ancestry, then claim that it is evidence for common ancestry -- a circular argument masquerading as scientific evidence? A: Some textbook treatments are very simplified and are indeed circular. Homology can now be rigorously tested and provides strong support for evolution. 什后信鳞柏铱矢补盲寇顽惑枣鬼消髓则公寇征鬼丛职肌阮镰达昨悠爪盾笑Answers to the Ten QuestionsAnswers to the Ten Questions Answers to the Ten Questions Q: VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS. Why do textbooks use drawings of similarities in vertebrate embryos as evidence for their co

文档评论(0)

cj80011 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档