- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同致病菌所致脓毒症患者低磷血症的临床研究
【摘要】目的 比较脓毒症组与非脓毒症组患者,并将脓毒症组进行亚组分析,探讨低磷血症的影响因素。方法 按年份分层随机抽取脓毒症组患者312例与非脓毒症组患者300例,脓毒症组患者中革兰阴性菌(G-菌)感染170例,革兰阳性菌(G+菌)感染142例,均包括4种不同细菌的感染。收集、整理各组患者的血磷值,比较各组间的低血磷发生率、平均血磷浓度和相对危险度(RR)。结果 脓毒症组与非脓毒症组比较,低血磷发生率差异具有统计学意义(P1.2;G-菌感染组与G+菌感染组比较、4种G+菌感染组间比较,低血磷发生率和平均血磷水平均差异具有统计学意义(P1.2;4种G-菌感染组间比较,低血磷发生率和平均血磷水平均差异无统计学意义(P0.05),RR1.2。结论 脓毒症是发生低磷血症的危险因素,尤其是本研究中的4种G-菌以及G+菌中的金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌感染,在临床工作中我们应警惕脓毒症患者血磷水平的变化,预防发生严重并发症。
【关键词】低磷血症;脓毒症;革兰阴性菌;革兰阳性菌
A clinical study of sepsis patients with hypophosphatemia infected by different bacteria Zhang Xiaoli* ,Qu Yan, Huang Jianbo. * Qingdao University,Qingdao,266071,China
Corresponding author: Qu Yan, Email: qdquyan@
【Abstract】Objective The aim of this study was to compare hypophosphatemia between the sepsis patients and the non-sepsis patients, and between within the subgroups of sepsis patients.Methods We collected 312 sepsis cases and 300 non-sepsis cases by stratified random sampling method yearly. In the sepsis cases, the number infected by gram-negative bacteria was 170, and by gram-positive bacteria was 142, containing 4 different bacteria infected cases in each one. Serum phosphorus of cases in each group were collected. The data were statistically processed to compare the incidence rates of hypophosphatemia, mean serum phosphorus levels and relative risk among groups. Results There was a statistical difference between the sepsis cases and the non-sepsis cases in incidence rate of hypophosphatemia (P1.2). There were statistical differences between the cases infected by gram-negative bacteria and the cases infected by the gram-positive bacteria, also among cases infected by 4 different gram-positive bacteria in both incidence rate of hypophosphatemia and average serum phosphorus level (all P 1.2.There were no statistical differences among cases infected by 4 different gram-negative bacteria in both incidence rate of hypophosphatemia and average serum phosphorus level (both P 0.05), and RR 1.2.
文档评论(0)