- 1、本文档共29页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Presupposition and Entailment Truth and falsity Pat is hungry. True under some possible circumstances, false under others. True if the “actual world” is in the “Pat is hungry” half. Truth and falsity Pat is hungry. Pat is sleepy. If we know the truth value of each of these sentences, we know in which “quadrant” of the space of possible worlds we can find the “actual world.” Knowledge/belief We can use this kind of diagram to characterize what we know, our “knowledge state.” If we know the following two things (to be true)… Pat is not hungry. Pat is sleepy. …then we have narrowed down the possible worlds in which the actual world must lie. Assertion We can think of assertion of a proposition as being the communication of an aspect of the speaker’s knowledge state to the hearer. Here, both believe that Pat is not sleepy, and the speaker is asserting that Pat is hungry (about which the hearer has no prior belief). Presuppositions vs. entailments Some utterances have a presupposition. He had stopped stealing office supplies. He used to steal office supplies. My dog ate my homework. I have a dog, and I have (er, had) homework. This similar, but distinct from, entailment. The emperor was assassinated. Someone was assassinated. The emperor died. Presuppositions vs. entailments Presuppositions have a different status from entailments. Consider: He hasn’t stopped stealing office supplies. He used to steal office supplies. My dog didn’t eat my homework. I have a dog, and I (still, it seems) have homework. The emperor wasn’t assassinated. ? Someone was assassinated. ? The emperor died. Presuppositions vs. entailments If p entails q, q does not follow from ?p. If p presupposes q, q still follows from ?p. That is, the presupposition of an utterance is taken as part of an “assumed background” that is not affected by the truth/falsity of the asserted proposition. Have you stopped stealing office supplies? Presupposition failure So, what happens if the presupposition isn’t met? M
您可能关注的文档
- CAMLESS ENGINES WordPress无凸轮发动机 WordPress.ppt
- Camouflage and Mimicry The Ruth Patrick Science 伪装和模仿帕特里克鲁思科学.ppt
- Camera Person Wikispaceswiki空间相机的人。.ppt
- Campaign Year of 1777 Plattsburgh City School District1777普拉茨堡市学区运动年.ppt
- Campaign for Gradelevel Reading分级阅读运动.ppt
- Campus Kitchen SLU校园厨房SLU.ppt
- Cambodia City University of New York柬埔寨市纽约市.ppt
- CAMPUS GROWTH Florida Gulf Coast University佛罗里达高尔夫海岸大学校园成长.ppt
- Campus Network Management Best Practice by Kuvempu校园网络管理的最佳实践kuvempu.ppt
- Can a German Software Giant Provide Client Sun Yat 一个德国软件巨头提供客户端中山.ppt
文档评论(0)