- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Competency to Give an Informed Consent: A Model for Making Clinical Assessments James Drane The Complexity Importance of Consent Autonomy But, the appearance only of consent does not equal autonomy and may lead patients to ‘choose’ things that harm them. Standards of competency involves law, ethics, and psychiatry. Must ensure that competent patients are prohibited from choosing and that incompetent patients aren’t allowed to make decisions. Models for Making Assessments A variety depending on different medical conditions: Acute vs. chronic Critical vs. noncritical 3 different standards or definitions of what it means to be competent Standard 1 Least stringent – applies to medical decisions that are not dangerous and objectively are in the patient’s best interests. Awareness Assent (a an objectively rational course of action). Will apply to people who will not be able to give “full consent” to other types of treatment. Standard 2 For situations where the illness is chronic (rather than acute) Where the treatment is more dangerous Where there are real alternative treatments Understanding (as opposed to awareness) of various options and their risks-benefits is required. This doers NOT require the ability to articulate conceptual or verbal understanding. The patient can choose to let the physician make the decision. Standard 3 Most stringent. Occurs when: medical action decided upon is dangerous and opposes both professional and public rationality. The available treatment is effective and not taking it is dangerous, perhaps life threatening. The decision appears (at least) to be irrational. Standard 3 Appreciation is required here where person understands the medical info + the nature and consequences of their alternate decision. The person must be able intelligently and coherently describe their reasons.
您可能关注的文档
- Commercial Purchasing The Chasm Between the United States商业采购美国之间的鸿沟.ppt
- Commercial success by looking for ‘Desire Lines’商业上的成功寻找“欲望线”.ppt
- Commodity Thermoplastics_ LDPE, HDPE, PP, PVC商品thermoplastics_ LDPE、HDPE、PP、PVC.ppt
- Common Childhood Illness University of Dundee普通儿童疾病邓迪大学.ppt
- Common Grant Mechanisms共同补助机制.ppt
- Common Core state Standards sccoe共同核心州立标准sccoe.ppt
- Common Greenhouse Plants Mishicot Agriscience常见的温室植物米希科特农业科学.ppt
- Common Ground Routledge共同点劳特利奇.ppt
- Common Logical Fallacies Auburn University常见逻辑谬误奥本大学.ppt
- Common Persuasive Techniques Bedford Public Schools常用的说服技巧贝德福德公立学校.ppt
- COMPETENT TO COUNSEL Introduction to Nouthetic Counseling主管律师nouthetic辅导简介.ppt
- Competing for Advantage Cengage Learning竞争优势圣智学习.ppt
- Competition Among Regulators World Bank世界银行之间的竞争.ppt
- Competitive Analysis of Buffer Policies with SLA Commitments与SLA承诺缓冲政策竞争分析.ppt
- Competition with Evolution in Ecology and Finance生态与金融竞争.ppt
- Competitive Auctions and Digital Goods竞争性拍卖和数字产品.ppt
- Competitive Effects of MeansTested School Vouchers测试手段的竞争效应.ppt
- Competitive Strategies APMF竞争策略 APMF.ppt
- Competitive Strategies University of Tennessee at 竞争战略田纳西大学.ppt
- Competitive Grammar Writing Johns Hopkins University竞争性语法写作约翰霍普金斯大学.ppt
最近下载
- KJ360F井下电力监控分站使用说明书.pdf VIP
- “坚决破除‘特殊论’和‘补偿心理”踏实干事、勤劳干事、廉洁干事”专题研讨材料.doc
- (正式版)D-L∕T 657-2015 火力发电厂模拟量控制系统验收测试规程.docx VIP
- 水泥单位产品能源消耗限额标准介绍.ppt VIP
- 美国煤矿安全生产法治化及对我国的影响.pdf VIP
- 暖通工程培训课件PPT最新完整版本.pptx VIP
- 大机捣固线路捣固施工组织方案.doc VIP
- 预制看台板施工方案.pdf VIP
- 基于AI技术的短视频监管策略研究.pdf VIP
- 广东省肇庆市2024-2025学年高二上学期期末考试英语试题含答案.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)