电针配合中药熏蒸治疗慢前列腺炎临床观察电针配合中药熏蒸治疗慢性前列腺炎临床观察.docVIP

电针配合中药熏蒸治疗慢性前列腺炎临床观察 何乐中 李俊纬 黄克勤 钱拉拉 (温州市第二人民医院针灸科 温州 325000) 【摘要】目的：观察电针配合中药熏蒸治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法将52例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组26例,对照组26例。治疗组采用电针配合中药熏蒸治疗,对照组口服左氧氟沙星片和舍尼通片。治疗3个疗程后,对比两组疗效及治疗前后慢性前列腺炎症状评分（NIH-CPSI）、最大尿流率(Qmax)、平均尿流量(Qave)变化情况。结果：治疗组总有效率为92.3%,对照组总有效率为61.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);两组治疗后NIH-CPSI评分、Qmax、Qave比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：治疗组与对照组比较能够明显改善患者症状，降低患者NIH-CPSI评分、提高最大尿流率(Qmax)和平均尿流量(Qave)。 【关键词】电针：中药熏蒸：慢性前列腺炎 Clinical Observations on Electroacupuncture and Chinese medicine fumaigation Treatment for Chronic Prostatitis Le Zhong He ，Jun Wei Li ，Ke Qin Huang， La La Qian (Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion ，Wen Zhou second pepoples hospital, 325000) [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture and Chinese medicine fumaigation in treating chronic prostatitis.Methods Fifty-two chronic prostatitis patients were randomly allocated to two groups,a treatment group of 26 cases and a control group of 26 cases.The treatment group received electroacupuncture and Chinese medicine fumaigation.The control group took Levofloxacin Tablets and Prostat Tablets.The therapeutic effects and pre-/post-treatment chronic prostatitis Symptom Scores (NIH-CPSI),maximum flow rates(Qmax)and average flow rates(Qave)were compared between the two groups after 3 courses of treatment.Results The total efficacy rate was 92.3%in the treatment group and 61.5%in the control group;there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.01).There were statistically significant differences in NIH-CPSI ,Qmax and Qave between the two groups after treatment (P＜0.05).Conclusion Symptoms improve significantly, NIH-CPSI decreased significantly ,Qmax and Qave increased significantly in the treatment group compared with the control group. [Key words] Electroacupuncture ：Chinese medicine fumaigation：chronic prostatitis 　　慢性前列腺炎(chronic prostatitis CP)是泌尿外科的常见病、多发病，多发于男性中青年，由于该病病因复杂，病情反复难愈，目前仍无特效的治疗方法。近年来笔者采用电针配合中药熏蒸的方法治疗慢性前列腺炎取得满意疗效,现报道如下： 临床