[椎间盘置换1.docVIP

腰椎椎间盘置换与融合治疗的Meta-分析 陈凌云, 唐文,刘志礼，舒勇*, * 通讯作者 0791-8692529 E-mail:shuyong57@163.com 江西 南昌330006 摘 要目的系统评价。方法 计算机检索MEDLINE(1966~200年月)，荷兰医学文摘EMbase1966~2009年月)，Cochrane 图书馆（200年第期）Cochrane 协作网背痛专业试验数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM截止200 年月）CNKI（截止 200年月）随机对照，进行严格的质量评价采用Revman4.2软件进行Meta-分析。结果 共纳入个，Meta分析结果显示结论 本研究结果显示，与传统相比，术；但。远期疗效有待高质量大样本长期随访的RCT进一步验证。 : Meta-分析；系统评价；腰椎间盘置换；融合 Systematic review of lumbar disc replacement versus fusion Chen ling-yun, Tang wen，Liu Zhi-li,Shu Yong* Department of Orthopaedics，The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China，330006 *Corresponding author: Shu Yong,Email: shuyong57@163.com 【Abstract】 Objective: To assess the effect and the safety of lumbar disc replacement versus fusion for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD).Methods : We conducted electronic database, identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) and some well designed clinical trails from Cochrane Back Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic database including Medline、Embase 、CBM、CNKI ,we also searched some Chinese Journals manually, and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field。Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently of each other；Among them ,the test group treated with artificial disc replacement ,while control group with fusion; The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for data analyses. Results：9 studies including a total of 1188 patients met with the enrolling criteria for the study，Meta-analysis indicated that no difference was found in the mean operation time、mean blood loss、mean hospital stay、re-operation rate、device success rate between two groups. the disc replacement group has lower rate of the complication , and the disc replacement group was more efficient in making progress VAS pain ,ODI score postoperation； Conclusion : the disc replacement group was more efficient in making progress VAS pain ,ODI score postoperation ,which means the disc replacement gro