- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
整形手术男性乳腺发育症患者心理的研究
刘晨 栾杰 丛中 柳春明 李桂珍
[摘要] 目的 了解整形的心理状态,探讨整形手术心理状态的。方法 采用焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表、自尊量表、体像障碍自评量表及艾森克人格问卷,对名者手术前后的心理状态进行问卷调查,分析调查结果。 结果 在名者中,术前焦虑、抑郁状态分别为5%%;手术前33.685±6.543、34.338±5.414和23.487±7.441,术后分别为26.442±4.278(P0.05)、27.968±7.112(P0.05)和16.184±8.544(P0.05)。患者术后分值较术前上升5.869±6.197 (P0.01)中的和量表的分值在常态范围之内,L表的分值超出常态标准结论[关键词] 整形美容手术 心理The preliminary research on the influence of the plastic and aesthetic surgery on the psychology of the patients with gynaecomastia Liu Chen, Luan Jie, Cong Zhong, et al. Department of plastic surgery of 301 Hospital and Postgraduate Medical College of P.L.A., Beijing,100853, China; Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100041, China; Department of Psychology, Beijing University, Beijing 100083, China.
[Abstract] Objective: The aim of this research was to identify the psychology of the patients with gynaecomastia, to study the influence of the plastic and aesthetic surgery on their psychology. Method: The self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), the self-rating depression scale(SDS), the self-esteem scale(SES),the self- rating body dysmorphic disorder(BDD) scale, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) were used to determine the psychology of the 65 patients with gynaecomastia. These patients were tested preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, and then the results were analyzed. Results: Of the 65 patients with gynaecomastia who completed these tests, it was found that the 54 percent were in anxiety preoperatively, 57 percent were in depression, and 14 percent were in BDD preoperatively. The scores in SAS, SDS, and self- rating BDD scale were 33.685±6.543, 34.338±5.414, and 23.487±7.441 preoperatively, respectively; and those were 26.442±4.278 (P0.05), 27.968±7.112 (P0.05), and 16.184±8.544 (P0.05). The scores in SES increased by 5.869±6.197 (P0.01) postoperatively. The scores in E scale, P scale, and N scale of EPQ were normal, and those in L scale were abnormal. The differences betw
您可能关注的文档
- 水流流速场试验实验(河海港航)分解.doc
- 水利工程预付款分解.doc
- 水利工程单元质量评定表全2分解.doc
- 南通市2015届高三上学期期中考试生物分解.doc
- 南通大学2011年硕士生招生专业目录分解.doc
- 水衡聚丙烯酰胺项目简本分解.doc
- 南通大学2007年硕士生招生专业目录分解.doc
- 水合物抑制评价实验装置使用说明分解.doc
- 南山音乐节策划书分解.doc
- 水管联接压盖冲压模设计毕业论文1分解.doc
- 2025秋季中国石油技术开发有限公司高校毕业生招聘15人(公共基础知识)测试题附答案解析.docx
- 2025福建福州市公安局马尾分局警务辅助人员招聘64人笔试备考题库带答案解析.docx
- 2026年国家电网招聘之经济学类考试题库500道附参考答案【b卷】.docx
- 2026河南农商银行系统校园招聘1736人(公共基础知识)测试题附答案解析.docx
- 2025年城口县特岗教师招聘笔试真题题库附答案解析.docx
- 2026年上半年北京市中小学教师资格考试(笔试)备考题库及参考答案【巩固】.docx
- 2026年国家电网招聘之文学哲学类考试题库300道及完整答案【精选题】.docx
- 2025年威县事业单位联考招聘考试真题汇编含答案.docx
- 2026年国家电网招聘之人力资源类考试题库300道及参考答案(研优卷).docx
- 中国移动中移系统集成2025秋季校园招聘(公共基础知识)综合能力测试题附答案解析.docx
原创力文档


文档评论(0)