Jeff Doyle的IPv6过渡技术胶片.pptVIP

Copyright ? 2005 Juniper Networks Copyright ? 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Transition Considerations What is your objective? Research Mandate Applications What is your mission? Carrier Service Provider Academic RD Government Enterprise 3 Types of Transition Mechanisms Dual Stacks IPv4/IPv6 coexistence on one device Tunnels For tunneling IPv6 across IPv4 clouds Later, for tunneling IPv4 across IPv6 clouds IPv6 - IPv6 and IPv4 - IPv4 Translators IPv6 - IPv4 Dual Stacking In most cases, the simplest approach IPv6 now supported on most modern network platforms Routers Servers Hosts If (almost) everything is “bilingual”, transition is controlled by DNS Dual Stacking Dual Stacking Tunnels Necessary if all nodes between communicating endpoints are not dual stacked Add a layer of complexity to the network and the transition plan Tunnel Applications Tunnel Types Configured Tunnels Application: Permanent site-to-site connectivity Carriers, SPs, large backbones Technologies: GRE, IP-IP, IPSec… MPLS Controlled, deterministic Automatic Tunnels: Endpoint Determination Authoritative Server Approach:Tunnel Broker Imbedded Endpoint Address Approach: 6to4 Imbedded Endpoint Address Approach: 6to4 Translators Necessary if IPv6-only endnode and IPv4-only endnode must speak Very few situations where translators should be required Dual stacking and/or tunneling should be sufficient in most cases The great majority of modern IPv6-capable network/host systems are dual stack, not IPv6-only IPv6-only devices are likely to be specialized, and in IPv6-only networks Add another layer of complexity to the network and the transition plan Avoid them if you can Translator Types Network level translators Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT)(RFC 2765) NAT-PT (RFC 2766) Bump in the Stack (BIS) (RFC 2767) Transport level translators Transport Relay Translator (TRT) (RFC 3142) Application level translators Bump in the API (BIA)(RFC 3338) SOCKS64 (RFC 3089) Applic