The Supreme Court Cases.ppt

The Supreme CourtCases Tyler Smith Matt Cunningham 烦沈蜀惊戌铆庞哑汐曹穆裸穗婿郡功铅慢椭剔迅伪粪边睫车搜秋枉否菜烷The Supreme Court CasesThe Supreme Court Cases Incorporation Barron v. Baltimore (1833) Palko v. Connecticut (1937) 蒙盼豺实咳泻腔牛彤其郑鲸萝侯狂饶拧绥抵俏榜鸦叹菏刊傣印型菜吧蕊延The Supreme Court CasesThe Supreme Court Cases Barron v. BaltimoreFebruary 16, 1833 Facts John Barron was co-owner of a profitable wharf in the harbor of Baltimore. As the city developed and expanded, large amounts of sand accumulated in the harbor, depriving Barron of the deep waters which had been the key to his successful business. He sued the city to recover a portion of his financial losses. Constitutional Questions Does the Fifth Amendment deny the states as well as the national government the right to take private property for public use without justly compensating the propertys owner? 矫殷歇帛郁腊啄野侣敞抡蛤驯咐绦驻庚水施翔幸销删订貉腐釉岁二鞭藻聊The Supreme Court CasesThe Supreme Court Cases Barron v. Baltimore Decision No. The Court announced its decision in this case without even hearing the arguments of the City of Baltimore. Writing for the unanimous Court, Chief Justice Marshall found that the limitations on government articulated in the Fifth Amendment were specifically intended to limit the powers of the national government. Citing the intent of the framers and the development of the Bill of Rights as an exclusive check on the government in Washington D.C., Marshall argued that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction in this case since the Fifth Amendment was not applicable to the states. Unanimous decision 隘拓术下团苟喊球碳锈陷龄尊哈戚犊眺轻屎夜浊逐夷疑若绷插的廷氰赎溪The Supreme Court CasesThe Supreme Court Cases Palko v. ConnecticutDecember 6, 1937 Facts of the Case: Charged with First Degree Murder Convicted of Second Degree Murder Sentenced to Life in Prison State of Connecticut appealed and won a new trial Palko convicted of First Degree Murder Sentenced to the Death Penalty Question of the Case: Does Palkos second conviction violate the protection against double jeopardy