Multiple Removal by Joint Least Square Migration联合最小平方偏移的多次移动.pptVIP

WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES Outline Introduction Outline Berryhill and Wiggins’s Methods The proposed method Why Finite Difference? Types of Water-Layer-Multiples Wavefield Extrapolation of RSG Decomposition of RSG Outline Synthetic Model Synthetic seismic data Decomposed RSG Predicted LWLM Waveform Comparisonbetween Data RSG Waveform Comparisonbetween Data LWLM Waveform Comparisonbetween Data RSG+LWLM Elimination of RSG LWLM Further Multiple Attenuation Outline Unocal field data Inadequate RSG Decomposition Emulated LWLM Waveform comparisonbetween Data Emulated LWLM Attenuation of WLM Attenuation of WLM Attenuation of WLM Attenuation of WLM Subtracted WLM Outline Conclusion Future Work Reference Thanks 2003 members of UTAM for financial support. Theoretically revives Berryhill and Wiggins methods for primary-preserving removal of one kind of water-layer-multiples. Requirements are practically obtainable, and can be derived from seismic data. Applicable to field data with approximations. Overcomes the Delft method by alleviating acquisition requirements and the need to know the source signature. Ghost decomposition for field data. 3D to 2D seismic data conversion. Multiple subtraction. Berryhill J.R. and Kim Y.C., 1986, Deep-water pegleg and multiples: emulation and suppression: Geophysics Vol. 51, 2177-2184. Wang Y., 1998, Comparison of multiple attenuation methods with least-squares migration filtering: UTAM 1998 annual report, 311-342. Wiggins J.W., 1988, Attenuation of complex water-multiples by wave-equation-based prediction and subtraction: Geophysics Vol.53 No.12, 1527-1539. Multiple prediction is the prerequisite for multiple subtraction. If the multiple prediction is more accurate, then the subtraction is more effective. The problem lies in the receivers recorder neither up-coming waves nor down-going waves’ pressure, the receivers recorder their superpositi