TakingSides.MarriageNetworksandDravidianKinshipin.pdf

TakingSides.MarriageNetworksandDravidianKinshipin.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共22页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
TakingSides.MarriageNetworksandDravidianKinshipin

Taking Sides. Marriage Networks and Dravidian Kinship in Lowland South America Michael Houseman (CNRS - Univ. Paris X) and Douglas R. White (UC Irvine)* Prepublication draft for Transformations of Kinship. pp. 214-243, in eds. Maurice Godelier, Thomas Trautmann and F.Tjon Sie Fat, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. Dual organization is a unifying concept underlying seemingly dissimilar alliance structures. An appropriate place to explore this idea is lowland South America, where dual organization is common. This chapter concentrates on the patterning of actual marriage networks in this region, with a view to identifying the invariant properties of such networks and then reconsidering the relationship between marriage network structure and other, categorical or jural features of social organization: notably, kinship terminologies, descent principles, and marriage rules. As a means to this end, we develop the concept of matrimonial sidedness. In doing so, we derive new results concerning dual organization, which makes possible a new understanding of Dravidianate systems. This analysis makes use of published genealogical data concerning the Makuna (Arhem 1981), the Pakaa-Nova (Vila?a 1992), the Yanomam? (Chagnon 1974), the Trio (Rivière 1969), the Parakana (Fausto 1991), the Waimiri-Artroari (Silva 1993), the Guahibo (Metzger 1968), the Shavante (Maybury-Lewis 1967) and the Suya (Seeger 1981), as well as Hornborgs (1986/1988) comparative study of foty-eight lowland South American societies. Classificatory Rules and the Need for Alternative Models Following Dumont (1953), Trautmann (1981, 1992) defines Dravidian kinship as a structural type (hereafter Dravidianate), as a set of terminological distinctions implying a rule of bilateral cross-cousin marriage. At the same time, he is quick to point out that as a cultural type relating to a particular set of concrete cases, this system evinces substantial variation. In some instances, marriage with certain cross-

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8010045112000002

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档