- 1、本文档共128页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PrincipalComponentAnalysis_Outliers_Validation_Reliability
Principal Component Analysis: Additional Topics Split Sample Validation Detecting Outliers Reliability of Summated Scales Sample Problems Split Sample Validation To test the generalizability of findings from a principal component analysis, we could conduct a second research study to see if our findings are verified. A less costly alternative is to split the sample randomly into two halves, do the principal component analysis on each half and compare the results. If the communalities and the factor loadings are the same on the analysis on each half and the full data set, we have evidence that the findings are generalizable and valid because, in effect, the two analyses represent a study and a replication. Misleading Results to Watch Out For When we examine the communalities and factor loadings, we are matching up overall patterns, not exact results: the communalities should all be greater than 0.50 and the pattern of the factor loadings should be the same. Sometimes the variables will switch their components (variables loading on the first component now load on the second and vice versa), but this does not invalidate our findings. Sometimes, all of the signs of the factor loadings will reverse themselves (the pluss become minuss and the minuss become pluss), but this does not invalidate our findings because we interpret the size, not the sign of the loadings. When validation fails If the validation fails, we are warned that the solution found in the analysis of the full data set is not generalizable and should not be reported as valid findings. We do have some options when validation fails: If the problem is limited to one or two variables, we can remove those variables and redo the analysis. Randomly selected samples are not always representative. We might try some different random number seeds and see if our negative finding was a fluke. If we choose this option, we should do a large number of validations to establish a clear pattern, at least 5 to 10. G
您可能关注的文档
- CCM PFC Inductor Design with Powder Core.ppt
- CCNAS SECURITY FINAL 100% 思科安全课程final答案.doc
- Central Queensland University HRMT19021 Principles of Employment Relations Text Chapter Slides.ppt
- CE 4 - Unit 3 changing planet.ppt
- cet-6(1.2).ppt
- ch 1 self awareness.ppt
- ch00 preface.ppt
- ch02-physical.ppt
- ch07-Process Synchronization.ppt
- Ch07Revealed Preference(微观-范里安-(上海交通大学,赵旭 ).ppt
- 家长纸杯花教案课件.pptx
- 2024年葫芦岛市龙港区城市社区专职网格员考试真题(附答案).docx
- 2025至2030吉他行业市场深度调研及供需格局及有效策略与实施路径评估报告.docx
- 2025至2030全球及中国可拆卸智能行李行业市场深度研究及发展前景投资可行性分析报告.docx
- 2025至2030婴儿奶瓶和奶嘴行业发展趋势分析与未来投资战略咨询研究报告.docx
- 2025-2030智慧农业传感器网络部署与数据价值挖掘研究.docx
- 2025年内蒙古通辽霍林郭勒市教育系统引进急需紧缺人才73人(哈尔滨师范大学)笔试高频难、易错点备考.docx
- 2024年辽宁省葫芦岛市辅警协警笔试笔试测试卷(附答案).docx
- 健身训练指南-健身教练的全面指南.pptx
- 《工会法》知识竞赛试题库及答案.docx
文档评论(0)