civilizationandhistory参考译文.doc

（1）Most of the people who appear most often and most gloriously in the history books are great conquerors and generals and soldiers, whereas the people who really helped civilization forward are often never mentioned at all. We do not know who first set a broken leg, or launched a seaworthy boat, or calculated the length of the year, or manured a field; but we know all about the killers and destroyers. People think a great deal of them, so much so that on all the highest pillars in the great cities of the world you will find the figure of a conqueror or a general or a soldier. 历史书上最常见和最风光的人物大多为伟大的征服者、将军和士兵，然而对于真正推动人类文明前进的人，却很少提及。我们不知道历史上谁第一个医好了病人的断腿，谁第一个发明了能够在海上行驶的船只，谁第一个计算出了一年的周期，以及谁第一个给田地施肥等等，但是我们却知道那些杀戮者和毁灭者。走进世界许多著名城市里，刻有他们雕像的纪念碑高高耸立，以表达民众对他们的无限敬重。 （2）And I think most people believe that the greatest countries are those that have beaten in battle the greatest number of other countries and ruled over them as conquerors. It is just possible they are, but they are not the most civilized. Animals fight; so do savages; hence to be good at fighting is to be good in the way in which an animal or a savage is good, but it is not to be civilized. Even being good at getting other people to fight for you and telling them how to do it most efficiently - this, after all, is what conquerors and generals have done - is not being civilized. 我想大部分人都认为征服者是王者，他们击败众国，使敌人臣服，一统天下。他们也许是王者，但他们却不是最文明的人。动物动武，野蛮人动武，因此士兵们运用兵器制胜和动物、野蛮人动武制胜没什么两样，这其实很不文明。即使王者和将军他们领导士兵，运筹帷幄，高效指挥，但是这其实也很不文明。 （3） People fight to settle quarrels. Fighting means killing, and civilized peoples ought to be able to find some way of settling their disputes other than by seeing which side can kill off the greater number of the other side, and then saying that that side which has killed most has won. And not only has won, but, because it has won, has been in the right. For that is what going to war means; it means saying that might is right. 人们通过战争解决争端，战争意味着杀戮。文明国家应该通过其它方式解决争端，而不是战争。在战争中双方都在杀戮，最后杀人多的一方获胜。并且不仅仅获胜，而且因为它获胜了