二因子实验设计.pptVIP

Four DOE Class_90a 5 二因子實驗設計 二因子無交互作用 二因子有交互作用 One-factor at a time 之方法 二因子實驗設計之模式 Data Sheet ANOVA表 – Two-Factor Factorial Example 決策模式： 因為F0(Primer Types) = 28.63 F0.05,2,12 = 3.89 F0(Application Methods) = 61.38 F0.05,1,12 = 4.75 所以此二因子對黏著力皆有顯著影響。 但 F0(Interaction) = 1.5 F0.05,2,12 = 3.89，所以此二因子的交互作用對黏著力無明顯之影響。 Another Example ANOVA Results Computer Output (Model Adequacy Checking) Multiple Comparisons The Three-factor ANOVA Model The ANOVA TABLE An Example The Results Computer Results Fitting Response Curve Example 5-5 Computer Results (Contour Plot and Response Surface) 6 2k因子階層設計 k個因子，每個因子2個水準(+,-) ，共2k次實驗（當 n = 1 時）。 在因子數不多的狀況下，常用於實驗初期，來了解因子對反應變數之可能影響。 只能看出因子對反應變數之線性作用(linear effect) ，無法預估高階曲面作用。 The 22 Factorial Design The Calculation (I) Effects Contrast The Calculation (II) Sum of Square Errors The AVONA Table The Regression Model Since the effect of AB is not significant, the regression model would be The Residuals Residuals at x1=1 and x2 = -1 23因子階層設計 23因子階層設計_符號表 計算 各因子之 Contrast = ?(Sign) ? (Treatment Combination) ContrastA = -(1)+a-b+ab-c+ac-bc+abc ContrastB = -(1)-a+b+ab-c-ac+bc+abc ContrastAB = 各因子之效用 Effect = Contrast / (n ? 2k-1) 各因子之 Sum of Square = Contrast / (n ? 2k) SSA = {-(1)+a-b+ab-c+ac-bc+abc}2 / 8n Example for 23 Design A: 速度 B: 切割深度 C: 切刀角度 計算_Example 各因子之效用 各因子之 Sum of Square SSA = {-(1)+a-b+ab-c+ac-bc+abc}2 / 8n = (27)2 / (8?2) = 45.5625 ANOVA 表_Example Example for 24 Design 24因子階層設計_符號表 ANOVA 表_Example AD交互作用與迴歸函數 2k Design with Center Points 增加預估曲線作用之能力 不破壞設計之平衡性(Balanced Design) 只需增加少數幾個實驗 Example ANOVA表_Example 7 2k 因子實驗之區隔化與混雜化 22 factorial design with Blocking The ANOVA Confounding(混雜化) 受限於資源（時間、金錢、人力等），無法再每一個區隔皆有完整的因子實驗。 Confounding is a design technique for arranging a complete factorial design in blocks, where the block size is smaller than the number of treatment combinations in one replicate. It causes information about certain treatment effects (usually high-order interactions) to be indi