CaseStudy的案例剖析写作.doc

  1. 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
CaseStudy的案例剖析写作CaseStudy的案例剖析写作CaseStudy的案例剖析写作

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Case Briefs for Research 1、编号索引(Citation) 2、当事方(Parties) E.g., in a tort case, parties include:defendant—appellant—tortfeasor; plaintiff—respondent--victim 诉讼历史(Prior Proceedings) E.g.,Trial court found against the defendant;Defendant appealed; Court of appeals reversed the trial court’s decision; To the end, this appeal is before the supreme court. 4、当事人的诉由(Theories of the Parties) E.g.,false imprisonment; breach of contract; consent; lack of consideration 5、寻求的法律救济(Objectives ) E.g.,getting specific performance; getting damages in the amount of $55,000; or getting acquitted 6、事实(Facts) legally significant facts background facts 7、确定争议焦点(Issue) E.g.,Did defendant Curties falsely imprison plaintiff Butterworth when he drove around in the car for seven hours without stopping to let her out? 8、法院的主张(Holding) E.g., Yes; Curties falsely imprisoned Butterworth because he used words or acts intended to confine Butterworth, he actually confined her in the car, and Butterworth was aware that she was confined. 9、分析(Reasoning) relevant rules; the application of those rules ; the conclusion the court reached 法官的附带意见(Dictum) 11、心得体会(Comments) Case Briefs for Class 1.Parties 2. necessary and relevant facts 3. claims 4. issues(issues of fact issues of law) 5. declaration; concurring opinion or dissenting opinion case study 1. Parties Plaintiff—Ohio State; Respondent—Matthew Reiner; Witness—Susan Batt, babysitter of the family ?2. Necessary Relevant Facts Respondent was charged with involuntary manslaughter in connection with the death of his 2-month-old son Alex, but he denied the charge and thought that Batt was the culpable party. Batt, as the witness of the trial, denied any involvement in Alex’s death and asserted her Fifth Amendment privilege. 3. Claims Reasons Respondent: denied child abuse and defended that the babysitter was the culpable party. Reasons: Respondent’s experts tes

文档评论(0)

shaoye348 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档