- 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments
A Global Ranking of Political Science
Departments
Simon Hix
London School of Economics
Rankings of academic institutions are key information tools for universities, funding agencies,
students and faculty. The main method for ranking departments in political science, through
peer evaluations, is subjective, biased towards established institutions, and costly in terms of
time and money. The alternative method, based on supposedly ‘objective’ measures of outputs
in scientific journals, has thus far only been applied narrowly in political science, using pub-
lications in a small number of US-based journals. An alternative method is proposed in this
paper – that of ranking departments based on the quantity and impact of their publications
in the 63 main political science journals in a given five-year period. The result is a series of
global and easily updatable rankings that compare well with results produced by applying a
similar method in economics.
Rankings of academic institutions are key information tools for universities,
public and private funding agencies, students and faculty. For example, to
investigate whether and why European universities lag behind their competi-
tors in the US, the European Economics Association commissioned research into
the ranking of economics departments on a global scale (see, especially, Coupé,
2003).
A variety of different ranking methods have been used in the natural sciences
and have started to emerge in the social sciences, especially in economics
(see, for example, Scott and Mitias, 1996; Dusansky and Vernon, 1998). All
methods have disadvantages and trade-offs. Nevertheless, the best methods
tend to have three elements: (1) they rank institutions on a global scale rather
than in a single country; (2) they use ‘objective’ measures of research outputs,
such as publications in journals, rather than subjective peer evaluations; and
(3) they are cheap to update, for example by allowing for mechanized annual
updates.
However, no such
您可能关注的文档
- 2016年农村东北大学单招模拟题(含解析).docx
- 2016年北京师范大学MTI翻译硕士考研历年真题解析,考研参考书,考研经验,考研报录比.pdf
- 2016年北京培黎职业学院自主招生模拟题(含解析).docx
- 2016年北京电影学院录音系电影声音创作方向在职艺术硕士考研复试辅导资料.pdf
- 2016年北京师范大学社会工作硕士考研招生人数-育明斯泰朗考研.pdf
- 2016年北京电影学院摄影系电影摄影与制作在职艺术硕士考研复试真题资料.pdf
- 2016年四川国际标榜职业学院单招模拟题(含解析).docx
- 2016年大学生英语竞赛C类(本科生)neccs决赛真题及试题答案详解.doc
- 2016年对外经济贸易大学信息学院841应用软件基础考研辅导班考研经验.pdf
- 2016年对外经济贸易大学翻译硕士英语考研真题,改错题考点汇总.pdf
- 专题02+时事热点(精讲课件)2025年中考地理二轮复习讲练测(安徽专用).pptx
- 专题10+经济建设 2025年中考道德与法治二轮复习讲练测(广东专用).pptx
- 专题02+西游记【名著概览】+-+2025年中考语文必读名著演练.pptx
- 专题七+认识国家(课件)-【省心备考】2025年中考地理一轮复习优质课件.pptx
- 第22课《礼记》二则——《大道之行也》(课件)-2024-2025学年八年级语文下册同步备课精品资源.pptx
- 跨学科实践15:制作“龙骨水车”(课件)-2024-2025学年八年级物理下学期项目化课程案例.pptx
- 第13课_辽宋夏金元时期的对外交流(课件)2024-2025学年七年级历史下册同步教学课件.pptx
- 选择题专项讲解——综合类(课件)2025年初中道德与法治中考选择题练习.pptx
- 第21课《庄子》二则——《北冥有鱼》(课件)-2024-2025学年八年级语文下册同步备课精品资源.pptx
- 7.3+感受澳大利亚(第二课时)-2025学年七年级地理下册同步精品课堂(晋教版2024).pptx
最近下载
- 第16讲 光的直线传播-2024年新八年级物理暑假提升自学课讲义(人教版2024)(解析版).docx VIP
- 国际商法教案.docx VIP
- 2025年鼎和财产保险股份有限公司人员招聘笔试备考试题及答案解析.docx
- 飞机发电机讲解.ppt
- 大数据与人工智能智慧树知到期末考试答案2024年.docx
- 2024年广东深圳市龙岗区总工会社会化工会工作者招聘笔试参考题库附带答案详解.pdf VIP
- 2024年贵州省中考适应性考试九年级数学试题和答案详解.docx
- 大学物理实验坐标纸.doc
- 小学低年级数学游戏教学的问题与对策研究——以开福区荷叶小学为例.docx VIP
- 直流电机PWM控制调速系统设计.doc VIP
文档评论(0)