网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.pdf

A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments

A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments Simon Hix London School of Economics Rankings of academic institutions are key information tools for universities, funding agencies, students and faculty. The main method for ranking departments in political science, through peer evaluations, is subjective, biased towards established institutions, and costly in terms of time and money. The alternative method, based on supposedly ‘objective’ measures of outputs in scientific journals, has thus far only been applied narrowly in political science, using pub- lications in a small number of US-based journals. An alternative method is proposed in this paper – that of ranking departments based on the quantity and impact of their publications in the 63 main political science journals in a given five-year period. The result is a series of global and easily updatable rankings that compare well with results produced by applying a similar method in economics. Rankings of academic institutions are key information tools for universities, public and private funding agencies, students and faculty. For example, to investigate whether and why European universities lag behind their competi- tors in the US, the European Economics Association commissioned research into the ranking of economics departments on a global scale (see, especially, Coupé, 2003). A variety of different ranking methods have been used in the natural sciences and have started to emerge in the social sciences, especially in economics (see, for example, Scott and Mitias, 1996; Dusansky and Vernon, 1998). All methods have disadvantages and trade-offs. Nevertheless, the best methods tend to have three elements: (1) they rank institutions on a global scale rather than in a single country; (2) they use ‘objective’ measures of research outputs, such as publications in journals, rather than subjective peer evaluations; and (3) they are cheap to update, for example by allowing for mechanized annual updates. However, no such

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档