GMAT语法逻辑类错误“有迹可循”(二).pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资料 GMAT语法逻辑类错误“有迹可循”(二) 许多GMAT考生向小编反映，GMAT考试目前的GMAT语法有日渐 变难的趋势，尤其是对于同学们谈虎色变的GMAT语法中的逻辑类考题 ，大家经常很难看出题目当中所蕴涵的逻辑错误，从而导致莫名其妙的 失分。针对这种现象，智课小编对此类考题加以分析，希望对大家会有 所帮助。 4.The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye. (A) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye (B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible (C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it (D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible(A) (E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible 这道题目与刚才那道题的解题思路是完全一样的，我们再来体会一 下这种题的出题特点。题干说人类眼睛的物理结构使它能感受到波长0. 0005的光，然而射线是看不见的，因为它的波长是0.1，这太长了以至 于不能够被眼睛探测到。A选项说波长看不见，这是个正确的逻辑，没 有问题，然而B选项说射线的波长太长了以至于波长不能被看见，这就 不对了。我们可以说射线看得见或是看不见，但是不能说波长看不见， 因此B选项也属于词与词之间的逻辑搭配关系错误。 5.Although the term “psychopath” is popularly applied to an especially brutal criminal, in psychology it is someone who is apparently incapable of feeling compassion or the pangs of conscience. (A) it is someone who is (B) it is a person (C) they are people who are (D) it refers to someone who is(D) (E) it is in reference to people 题干说尽管术语psychopath指的是一个特别残忍的罪犯，在心理 学中它指的是某个人，他对别人没有同情心也不会受到良心的谴责。这 道题的出题思路与上两道题略有不同，A，B选项谓语动词用了be动词 ，变成术语是某个人了，这个逻辑就错误了，术语指的是人而本身不是 人，所以逻辑搭配错误，答案应该选D。 6.Promotions, retirements, deaths, and other actions approved by the board of directors at its May meeting will be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper. (A) Promotions, retirements, deaths, and other actions approved by the boa