- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
雅思阅读实战训练模拟试题(五)-智课教育出国考试
智 课 网 雅 思 备 考 资 料
雅思阅读实战训练模拟试题(五)-智课教育出国考试
下面智课教育出国考试为大家整理了雅思阅读实战训练模拟试题(五
),供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
★Dont wash those fossils!
Standard museum practice can wash away DNA.
1.Washing,brushing and varnishing fossils — all standard
conservation treatments used by many fossil hunters and
museum curators alike — vastly reduces the chances of
recovering ancient DNA.
2.Instead,excavators should be handling at least some of
their bounty with gloves,and freezing samples as they are
found,dirt and all,concludes a paper in the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences today.
3.Although many palaeontologists know anecdotally that this
is the best way to up the odds of extracting good
DNA,Eva-Maria Geigl of the Jacques Monod Institute in
Paris,France,and her colleagues have now shown just how
important conservation practices can be. This information,they
say,needs to be hammered home among the people who are
actually out in the field digging up bones.
4.Geigl and her colleagues looked at 3,200-year-old fossil
bones belonging to a single individual of an extinct cattle
species,called an aurochs. The fossils were dug up at a site in
France at two different times — either in 1947,and stored in a
museum collection,or in 2004,and conserved in sterile
conditions at -20 oC.
5.The teams attempts to extract DNA from the 1947 bones
all failed. The newly excavated fossils,however,all yielded
DNA.
6.Because the bones had been buried for the same amount
of time,and in the same conditions,the conservation method
had to be to blame says Geigl. As much DNA was degraded in
these 57 years as in the 3,200 years before, she says.
Wash in,wash out
7.Because many palaeontologists base their work on the
shape of fossils alone,their methods of conservation are not
designed to preserve DNA,Geigl explains.
8.The biggest problem is how they are cleaned. Fossils are
often washed together on-site in a large bath,which can allow
water — and contaminants in the
文档评论(0)