Enalapril irbesartan and felodipine in essential hypertension the role of early renal damage in comparison.docVIP
- 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Enalapril irbesartan and felodipine in essential hypertension the role of early renal damage in comparison
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 3
Enalapril irbesartan and felodipine in essential hypertension the role of early renal damage in comparison
[Keywords:] hypertension; Enalapril; Irbesartan; felodipine; β 2-microglobulin
[Abstract] Objective To compare the enalapril and irbesartan, felodipine in essential hypertension (EH) combined β 2-microglobulin (β 2-MG) in patients with increased antihypertensive effect and to evaluate the drugs on the kidney functional damage to the effectiveness and safety. Methods 90 patients with mild - moderate hypertension in patients with elevated β 2-MG, using randomized, single-blind method were randomly divided into 3 groups: enalapril group (30 cases), irbesartan group (30 cases) and non-Luo amlodipine group (30 cases) were given enalapril 10 ~ 20 mg / d, irbesartan 75 ~ 150 mg / d, felodipine 5 mg / d for 12 weeks, clinic blood pressure were measured before and after treatment, the dynamic blood pressure and blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and serum β 2-MG. The results of three groups of drug treatment, surgeries, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower than the base value (P amp;lt;0.01), between the two groups had no significant difference (Pamp;gt; 0.05), 3 groups before and after treatment of blood test results of β 2-MG Irbesartan enalapril group difference was significant (P amp;lt;0.01), rather than the group before and after felodipine was no significant difference (Pamp;gt; 0.05), and the first two groups with the first three groups the difference was significant ( P amp;lt;0.01). Conclusions Long-acting antihypertensive drugs can have control of blood pressure is good, but ACEI, ARB class analogy CCB is more effective protection of renal function.
[Keywords:] hypertension; Enalapril; Irbesartan; felodipine; β 2-microglobulin
Comparison of enalapril, irbesartan and felodipine on primary hypertension patients’ early renal injury
[Abstract] Objective To compare the treatment of enlapril,
您可能关注的文档
- Emergency embolization of uterine bleeding.doc
- Emergency hemostasis hemostatic effect deposited films.doc
- Emergency Integrative Medicine Clinical observation of treatment of hypertension vertigo.doc
- Emergency care problems and countermeasures.doc
- Emergency laparoscopic repair of gastroduodenal perforation analysis of 34 cases.doc
- Emergency laparotomy cholecystectomy complications of bile leakage.doc
- Emergency left colon resection and anastomosis of a prospect.doc
- Emergency mobile medical service units 136 members of the analysis of the psychological coping mechanisms.doc
- Emergency needs for health education of patients and observing Investigation.doc
- Emergency number card in the treatment of mass casualties.doc
- 终身学习平台课程推荐系统精准匹配策略研究2025年报告.docx
- 2025年远程办公软件用户行为分析及改进建议.docx
- 深度解析:2025年智能家居互联互通标准统一化对智能家居行业发展的战略规划.docx
- 2025年互联网医疗医生激励与医疗服务同质化竞争分析.docx
- 城市内涝预警系统在2025年用户使用场景与满意度分析.docx
- 2025年健身器材跨境电商仓储布局与物流成本控制策略研究报告.docx
- 纺织服装供应链协同与管理的数字化要求.pdf
- 母婴护理服务标准化与品牌建设关键要素分析.docx
- 无人机空域使用中的2025年公共安全风险评估与防控措施.docx
- 露营地生态旅游产品与旅游消费升级关系研究报告.docx
文档评论(0)