- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
CSCE390ProfessionalIssuesinComputerScienceand.ppt
CSCE 390Professional Issues in Computer Science and EngineeringThree Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist and Relativist Positions Spring 2010 Marco Valtorta mgv@ The Piracy Dilemma Here is the piracy dilemma (i.e., a dilemma concerning wrongful appropriation of computing resources). Suppose I use my account on one of my universitys mainframe computers for something that has no direct relation to University business. This use could be anything from sending an e-mail message to a friend, to conducting a full-blown private business on the computer (billing, payroll, inventory, etc.). The absolutist [idealist or realist] solution to this dilemma would probably be that the above-described activities are unethical -- whether only the e-mail message is involved, or the larger-scale business activities (although the absolutist would recognize a difference between the two in the amount of wrong being done). On the other hand, a relativist [pragmatist or existentialist] might say that the latter activities were wrong because they tied up too much memory and slowed down the machines operation, but the e-mail message wasnt wrong because it had no significant effect on operations. Student Privacy Dilemma Next consider a dilemma having to do with privacy. I use my account to acquire the cumulative grade point average of a student who is in a class which I instruct. I obtained the password for this restricted information from someone in the Records Office who erroneously thought that I was the students advisor. The absolutist [idealist] solution to this dilemma would probably be that I acted wrongly, since the only person who is entitled to this information is the student and his or her advisor. The relativist [pragmatist] would probably ask why I wanted the information. If I said that I wanted it to be sure that my grading of the student was consistent with the students overall academic performance record, the relativist might agree that such use was acceptable. [Not
您可能关注的文档
- 2010年河南省农信社考试真题解读.doc
- 2013中国科技咨询协会咨询职业女性.doc
- 2013届高考英语一轮复习课时知能训练必修二Unit2The.doc
- 2017年温州市铁投集团运营分公司生产岗招聘计划表——一般.doc
- 6thAquariusSAC-DScienceMeeting.ppt
- ActuarialScienceandFinancialMathematicsDoingIntegrals.ppt
- AnimalScience118Nutrition.ppt
- ASCIENCEOFMEMORY.ppt
- Astronomy&theProcessofScience.ppt
- AttributionFebruary5,2008CurtisTravis,PhDScience.ppt
- CSE114–ComputerScienceIInheritance.ppt
- CSUnpluggedTechniquesforTeachingComputerScience.ppt
- Data-IntensiveComputingintheScienceCommunity.ppt
- DepartmentofComputerScienceandEngineering,HKUST.ppt
- Dept.ofComputerScience&Engineering,CUHK.ppt
- DiscreteStructuresforComputerScience.ppt
- DonnaHarawayACyborgManifestoScience,Technology,.ppt
- DoritAharonovSchoolofComputerScienceand.ppt
- ECommerceComputerScienceTriposPartIIAnInternational.ppt
- EnvironmentalScience&Treehuggers.ppt
文档评论(0)