20 210-213 食品安的全与检测 4 通过“WTO争端解决机制”应对日本“一律标准”的可行性分析.pdf

现代食品科技 Modern Food Science and Technology 2012, Vol.28, No.2 通过 “WTO争端解决机制” 应对日本 “一律标准”的可行性分析 1 1 1 1 2 1 凌莉 ，李志勇，易敏英，李建军，刘津，高东微 （1.广东出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心，广东广州 510623 ） （2.国家质量监督检验检疫总局标准法规中心，北京 100088 ） 摘要：无论从理论上还是他国的实践上，WTO成员可以通过WTO争端解决机制应对不利于本国的技术贸易措施。日本农 业化学品残留新制度“肯定列表制度” 中的“一律标准” 已经对我国农产品出口日本造成了极大阻碍。因此，本文根据“一律标准” 违反 《SPS协议》条款的情况，分析通过WTO争端解决机制，对日本“一律标准”采取诉讼措施的可行性。研究结果表明，采用 WTO诉讼程序应对“一律标准”将会是一种有益的尝试。 关键词：农业化学品残留；一律标准；SPS协议；争端解决机制；诉讼程序；可行性 文章篇号：1673-9078(2012)2-210-213 The Feasibility Analysis of Countermeasures against the Uniform Limit in Japan through WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism 1 1 1 2 1 1 LING Li , LI Zhi-Yong , YI Min-Ying , LI Jian-Jun , LIU Jin , GAO Dong-Wei (1.Guangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Guangzhou 510623, China) (2.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine Standards and regulations Center, Beijing 100088, China) Abstract: Any WTO member can use countermeasures against those adverse technical trade measures through the dispute settlement mechanism not only in theory but also according to the past experiences of other countries. The Uniform Limit from the current agricultural chemical residue system in Japan, the Positive List System, has already hindered the export trade of agricultural product from China to Japan greatly. Thus in this paper, analysis of the feasibility of the legal proceeding against the Uniform Limit through WTO dispute settlement mechanism was given according to the evidences of violation against SPS Agreement articles. It was indicated that the counterm