举办奥运会的利和弊.docVIP

Bidding for and hosting the Olympics successfully is, perhaps, the ultimate glory for a city. However, before transforming the dream into reality, the benefits and drawbacks of bidding for the Olympics should be weighed carefully. 申办和举办奥运会的成功或许是对一个城市最终的荣耀。然而，在转化为现实的梦想，效益以及申办奥运的缺点，应仔细衡量。 Disadvantage： First of all, the environmental impacts, including the increasing exhaust fumes of cars, more pressure on water resources, huge amount of wasted leaflets and other materials used for public activities, are most probably neglected. In order to broaden the streets, some trees may have to be cut. Near the construction site, the tiny dust may linger in the air for a long time. Reduction of farmland may be caused by the need of setting up new sports centre or accommodation facilities. These environmental consequences can be especially serious in a resource-limited and densely-populated city in a third-world country. 首先，对环境的影响，包括汽车废气增加，更多的水资源的压力，传单和浪费公共活动的其他材料，投入大量最有可能被忽视。为了扩大在街上，有些树木可能被削减。附近的施工现场，微小的尘埃可能停留在空气中很长一段时间。耕地减少的原因可能成立新的体育中心或住宿设施的需要。这些环境后果可能是严重的资源有限，人口稠密的城市在一个第三世界国家。 Besides, if talking about the economic benefit, it should not be forgotten that a quick boosting may lead to bubble growth, which may easily crash. If not well managed and organized, the big event may not be so ofitable, and the new facilities may be forever empty after the games. Yes, there have been cases that host cities ended up with enormous debts. Finally, let’s think about the low-income groups in the city. What will they get from the Olympics bidding? More tax, more fees, more expensive property prices, and higher cost of living. These definitely are not good news for them. 此外，如果对经济利益时，不应忘记，快速提高可能会导致泡沫的增长，这可能很容易崩溃。如果没有良好的管理和组织，大事件可能不会如此ofitable，新的设施，可能会在奥运会后永远空。是的，有案件承办城市结束了巨大的债务了。 最后，让我们想想低城市低收入群体。他们会得到什么，从申办奥运？更多的税，多收费，更昂贵的物业价格，和较高的生活费用。这绝对是不利于他们的消息。 投标或不，这是一个问题。这是到市政府的选择，和当地市民。一旦作出决定，他们可以做的，是使大多数的利益，并减少缺点最少。 ADVANTAGE: Hosting the Olympics surely would bring about much gain to a cit