物业案例：一楼葡萄架“方便小偷”.doc

物业案例：一楼葡萄架“方便小偷” 物业案例：一楼葡萄架“方便小偷”提要：就此事而言，如果一楼葡萄架过高，就有可能危及二楼的安全，造成潜在的威胁，侵害了二楼的合法权益。一般在具体处理过程中 物业案例：一楼葡萄架“方便小偷” 为了将自家的庭院设计成田园风情，家住春申万科一楼的某业主在庭院里搭建了一个约两米高的葡萄架，而这一举动却引起了楼上邻居杨女士的强烈不满。 杨女士认为，底楼两米高的葡萄架直接伸向自家的窗户，其顶端距离二楼卧室窗台下沿仅仅大约几十厘米。葡萄架就像一个通往自家室内的扶梯，无疑“便宜”了小偷。 杨女士与楼上邻居的纠纷曾经过物业、居委会、房管办等部门多次协调，但直至今日，问题也没能解决。 而一直处理这一葡萄架纠纷的莘庄房管办工作人员则表示，对于葡萄架等植物或设施，房管办很难认定是否属于违章搭建。 专家解读：发生盗窃可以要求赔偿 同济大学法学系副教授、上海海众律师事务所律师刘春彦分析说，就此事而言，如果一楼葡萄架过高，就有可能危及二楼的安全，造成潜在的威胁，侵害了二楼的合法权益。一般在具体处理过程中，如果双方能够协商，葡萄架究竟应当多高可以由物业公司或者业主大会、业主委员会出面协调。业主大会和业主委员会可以直接要求违章搭建的业主停止侵害、消除危险、排除妨碍。若发生了盗窃，还可以要求赔偿损失。 如果无法协商或者协商不成，根据《物权法》的规定，业主也可以直接向法院提起诉讼。 法条规定 《物权法》第三十五条：妨碍物权或者可能妨碍物权的，权利人可以请求排除妨害或者消除危险。《物权法》第七十一条：业主对建筑物专有部门享有占有、使用、收益和处分的权利。业主行使权利不得危及建筑物的安全，不得损害其他业主的合法利益。 Measures for the routine management of moral education in Middle SchoolsMethod of conventional management of moral education in middle schoolFirst, the guiding ideology:School moral education is an organic whole of the whole education work, always adhere to the school adhere to the moral education, education for this product, and actively promote the quality education, the school building efficient curriculum system of moral education, moral education, improve the sense of attraction and appeal, enhance the moral education work for through and timeliness. Teach everyone, service education and management education, and school moral education work must be with family education and community education closely together, to form a concerted pattern, and strive to create a good atmosphere for education, and to promote the all-round development of students, to establish a scientific moral education full of vigor the For long-term mechanism.Two, the goal of moral education:To guide the students to form the correct world outlook, outlook on life, values, to cultivate students unity and mutual assistance, honest and trustworthy, law-abiding, good quality, hard work, set a good XX students ideological quality, psychological qualit