Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome an individual patient data meta-analysis.docVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约6.05万字
约 13页
2017-05-16 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome an individual patient data meta-analysis.doc

1、本文档共13页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome an individual patient data meta-analysis

BMC Pediatrics BioMedCentral Study protocol Open Access Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis Filip Cools*1, Lisa M Askie2, Martin Offringa3 for the Prevention of Ventilator Induced Lung Injury collaborative study Group (PreVILIG Collaboration) Address: 1Department of Neonatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Belgium, 2NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia and 3Department of Pediatric Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Email: Filip Cools* - filip.cools@uzbrussel.be; Lisa M Askie - laskie@.au; Martin Offringa - m.offringa@amc.uva.nl; the Prevention of Ventilator Induced Lung Injury collaborative study Group (PreVILIG Collaboration) - filip.cools@uzbrussel.be * Corresponding author Published: 16 May 2009 Received: 1 April 2009 Accepted: 16 May 2009 BMC Pediatrics 2009, 9:33 doi:10.1186/1471-2431-9-33 This article is available from: /1471-2431/9/33 ? 2009 Cools et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Despite the considerable amount of evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta- analyses, uncertainty remains regarding the efficacy and safety of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared to conventional ventilation in the early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. This results in a wide variation in the clinical use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for this indication throughout the world. The reasons are an unexplained heterogeneity between trial results and a number of unanswered, clinically important questions. Do infants with different r