点右键执行快捷菜单中的目标另存为命令-Let,For,itisclear.docVIP

P36---P37 Proof Let , For , it is clear by Theorem 3.6. If , , so .Conversely, let , then . Otherwise, if , then .Similarly, . Therefore . For , it is immediate. If , , so , . Similarly . So . By , . 6. Proof Let and , is a subgroup of order by Theorem 3.4. Suppose is another subgroup of order , , for some by Theorem 3.5. So by Theorem 3.4, , , then . So . 9. Proof Clearly . For , let. Since is abelian group, so , then . So . P40---P41 3．The following conditions on a finite group are equivalent. is prime. and has no proper subgroups. for some prime . Proof is immediate by Theorem3.2. Let and is finite, by Lagrange Theorem. ( is prime) implies , so and has no proper subgroups. Suppose has a proper subgroup . Since is prime, and by Lagrange Theorem. It is a contradiction. 9. If are subgroups of a groupsuch that , then . Proof Since , is clear. For , s.t. Since, . Therefore . 11. Let be a group of order ; thencontains an element of order . If is odd and abelian , there is only one element of order . Proof Suppose the order of is greater than, for . Let . Clearly . For then there must be and , so . Therefore is even and is odd, it is a contradiction. If is odd and abelian, let and are elements of order and. It is clear that and the order of is . So is subgroup of . By Lagrange Theorem, , that is , so , it is a contradiction.