不同材质埋线法治疗颈椎病患者不良反应的比较研究.pdfVIP

南京中医药大学学报2012年9月第28卷第5期 ——484—— ·报道· 不同材质埋线法治疗颈椎病患者不良反应的比较研究 冯骅，蒋亚秋，丁敏+，林天云 (南京中医药大学附属无锡市中医医院，江苏无锡214000) 摘要：目的 比较不同材质微创埋线法治疗颈椎病患者不良反应的差异。方法92例颈椎病患者均取颈椎两侧夹脊穴(C3／ 穴位埋植。比较治疗后、治疗1周后、治疗2周后患者双侧埋线穴位部位压痛、红肿、硬结3种不良反应的差异。结果2种 生率低于羊肠线，是一种优良的埋植材料。 关键词：穴位埋线；羊肠线；PDS；颈椎病；不良反应 中图号：R245．9 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1672—0482{2012)05—0484—03 onAdverseEffectsonPatientswithCervical with DifferentMaterials ComparativeStudy SpondylosisEmbeddingby FENG Hua，JIANG Min。，LIN Ya—qiu，DING Tian—yun WuxiTCM to Chinese (Affiliated HospitalNanjingUniversityof Medicine，Wuxi，214000，China) ABSTRACT：OBJECTIVETo differentmaterialsfor anditsadverseeffectson withcervical compare embedding patients spon— 6 atbothleftand withcervical wereselected．Itwas dylosis．METHODSacupoints(C3／C5／C7right)92patients spondylosis 3 atleftsidewerePDS receivedPDS*II and3 at sidewere requiredpoints embedding right surgicalgut group，which points received adverse tender andscleromaof group，whichsurgicalgutembedding．Threeeffects，includingpain，reddishswelling pa— tients after wkaftertreatmentand2wksaftertreatmentwere Threeadverseeffects right treatment，1 compared．RESULTS the in aftertreatmentbothmaterialsfor showednO happenedright embedding，whichsignificant adverseeffects 1wk in more PDS with differ— aftertreatment were than happened surgicalgutgroup obviously groupsignificant adverseeffects 2wkaf