标准必要专利“合理无歧视”许可费计算的原则及方法.pdf

下载文档 降价啦

5
0
约2.2万字
约 9页
2017-05-31 发布于湖北
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

标准必要专利“合理无歧视”许可费计算的原则及方法.pdf

1、本文档共9页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Abstract: The recent U.S. district courts judgment of the Microsoft Corp. V. Motorola Inc. case provides a useful reference for the licensing fee calculation under the Standard-Setting Organizations(SSO) reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) rule. RAND licensing commitments create enforceable contracts between SSOs and the respective members. The specific meaning of reasonable and nondiscriminatory should therefore be explained based on the purpose of the contract, and this should be the basic principle of RAND licensing fee calculation. To meet the requirements of the contract purpose, the proper range of RAND licensing fees should be able to help build advanced standards and promote their application. The value and contribution of the patent itself should be the key factor when determining RAND licensing fees, and the “basic licensing fee + adjustment” method could be used to calculate licensing fees. Key Words: standard essential patent; RAND license; licensing fee aStandard-Essential Patent SEP DVDDVD 2009 6C3C b2008 20084c a b c