邱峰《语文培植》白话副词“并”的起源（国外英文资料）.doc

邱峰《语文建设》文言副词“并”的来源（国外英文资料） The semantic genes of the all also fail to explain why other general terms have not evolved this tone. In short, the and tone of the adverb will need to be reconsidered. Second, the adverb of and is derived (1) the adverb and the range adverb source Originally and verb, table b and V (standing,...), a separate group, the meaning of the V is hosted by and word, the concrete meaning depends on the context. After implying an adverb, used before the verb, constitute a V and said b V at the same time, but the meaning of and by and bear alone, V can meet the need of justice for different verbs. We believe that the adverbs and grammar into the decisive factor is the original meaning contains two semantic features: at the same time and V (standing,...). Initially, the word and represents a relatively complete motion, including the action itself V and action. But its status is different: V (standing, existence...) is the core of the action process, the core semantics; Action love at the same time is the action accompanying information, is the edge semantics. In other words, the transformation of and from the verb to the adverb is actually the transformation of the characteristic of the action of the table action to the action of the table. How does this change happen? As mentioned above, do and the core of the semantic features of predicate verb V of the semantic change with context, so you need a listener takes more cognitive effort in context, otherwise it is difficult to determine the specific meaning. Obviously, this violates the principle of provincial power in speech communication; Reason and if you dont want to be eliminated had to use other means to clear the table, the ultimate conforms to Chinese overall development trend, chose the dual tone change this way, with the help of other verbs to composition table, form and + (line,...) structure type. In this construct, the move is to make up for the non-deterministic core semantic V, so it o