走出养老金并轨预期的误区（国外英文资料）.docVIP

走出养老金并轨预期的误区（国外英文资料） Although a complete coverage of basic old-age insurance system of the endowment insurance system is not the same thing, but there are signs that a considerable part of peoples expectations of the basic endowment insurance system is too high, there are all sorts of misunderstanding. If they dont eliminate the misunderstanding, not only conducive to reducing the gap between the basic endowment insurance, it will create new resistance, makes the system system design of teacher heel dead. To avoid this dilemma, it is necessary to eliminate the misconceptions of the pros and cons as soon as possible. Stepping out of the parallel track is the mistake of a pension plan, which focuses on the rule of justice Social development research institute of national development and reform commission (NDRC) Yang, head of a passage on the Internet, from the perspective of basic endowment insurance, should be equal, any worker, civil servants, institution after the basic old-age insurance for enterprise employees should be the same. This passage is undoubtedly in a certain context, and it requires a certain background knowledge to be properly grasped; From the point of view of its actual effect, however, did not play a positive role, but peoples experiences appetite, seems to be the current system problems to be solved is a flattening of the national pension. This is mainly in the following areas of misunderstanding: first, any worker should be equal easily leads to a widening of the parallel track. Farmers because no objections belongs to the category of workers, and we say the current system, is mainly refers to enterprises, institutions and interests balance between civil servants. If farmers are included, they exceed the limits of the basic old-age insurance. Second, the so-called basic old-age insurance should be the same easy to lead to a one-size-fits-all approach. There are several levels of differential between enterprise tracks and career and civil servic