就《中国思想史》访朱维铮、葛剑雄先生(国外英语资料).docVIP

就《中国思想史》访朱维铮、葛剑雄先生(国外英语资料) Interview with Zhu Weizheng and Mr. Ge Jianxiong on the history of Chinese thought / forwarded by the Chinese Studies Network Zhu Weizheng (a famous historian, historian of ideology and Culture) (- people - respondents interview, below.) Today, want to ask Mr. Zhu for academic works on the point of view of the how to do. Also, Mr. Ge Zhaoguang said that 1895 was a dividing line of modern times, and this is not what you think. Why are the stages of modern history different?. What do you think should be paid attention to in the history of these ideas? Or what questions should be studied and what should be done? Which studies are relevant to more people? - I thought in the academic have different views is normal, everyone has their own opinions, in order to improve the academic. For example, there are some views that are different from me. For the academic problem, should advocate the truth, I believe that the history of reality, believe that the thought and the thought history is the history of each other, but also believe that any historical reality, not through the discussion of pure academic cognition is difficult to study, there must be controversy, also need to debate. In fact, academically, if everyone seems to think the same, its worse. We can only prove to the contrary that there is no atmosphere for seeking truth, and there is no historical reality. Therefore, I am in favor of academic fight, friends to friends, arguing, arguing. The debate, this is normal, may also Never mind, but it is best to avoid impulsive, especially by non academic power to suppress different views. To write a history of thought with ones power and write it so thick, you ask him to have a deep thought on every question, I think it is not possible. I didnt use to write systematic books before. There are some things I didnt want to say or say, but as a book, you have to say no. What shall I do? So, learn from others, or have to spend great effort to re - study,