强世功权力的组织网络和法律的治理化——马锡五审判方式和中国.pdf

强世功权力的组织网络和法律的治理化——马锡五审判方式和中国.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
强世功 :权力的组织网络与法律的治理化—— 马锡五审判方式与中国法律的 新传统(上) Organizational Nexus of Power and Governmentality of Law: Formation of New Legal Tradition in 1940s Co mmunist China Jiang Shigong Abstract There are two opposite kinds of approaches to the studies of mediation characterized by the Ma Xiwu’s Judicial Mode in 1940s communist China. One, based upon historicism, maintains that im portance of mediation in legal system of communist China exhibits the continuance and extension of traditional legal culture in the history. The other, based upon functionalism, emphasizes the breakup of traditional legal culture and the modification of mediation by communist ideology. Based upon the reflection and criticism of these two kinds of approaches, with some new materials, the article brings forward new approach of relation/event based upon ‘archaeology’ and ‘genealogy’ in the sense used by Foucault to this topic. In this way, the article put the Ma Xiwu’s Judicial Mode as an incidental historical event into the power relations in the transformation from traditional empire to modern nation-state in China. In the process of state-making, the state law transplanted from the West met the resistance from the indigenous customary law exemplified by marriage law. In order to settle such troubles, the Communist Party used various power techniques and constructed ‘organizational nexus of power’ so as to put its power into the rural society. Therefore, the incidental medication practice was integrated into the nexus of power as a special kind of governmental art. In the competition between legal discourse regarding law as autonomous system an d political discourse regarding law as efficacious instrument of governance by the Party, state law was eventually subject to the governmentality as an instrument, which constructed the heart of new legal tradition. In this new tradition, the aims of law are not social justice but the Party

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

daijun + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档