法院附设调解制度与法院调解制度之比较研究.pdf

法院附设调解制度与法院调解制度之比较研究.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共47页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
法院附设调解制度与法院调解制度之比较研究论文

目录 摘 要···················································································································I Abstract ··················································································································III 引 言··················································································································1 一、国外及我国台湾地区法院附设调解制度的运作现状·····································3 (一)美国法院附设调解制度··········································································3 (二)日本的法院附设调解制度······································································4 (三)韩国的法院附设调解制度······································································6 (四)我国台湾地区的法院附设调解制度······················································7 二、法院附设调解制度的理论考察·········································································9 (一)法院附设调解制度的含义······································································9 (二)法院附设调解制度的性质······································································9 (三)法院附设调解制度的基本特征····························································11 (四)法院附设调解制度的基本功能····························································12 三、我国法院调解制度的现状及其评价·······························································15 (一)我国法院调解制度的司法地位和独特功能·········································17 (二)我国法院调解制度的弊端分析及改革的必要性·································17 四、我国法院调解制度与国外及台湾地区法院附设调解制度之比较················22 (一)二者产生的背景不同············································································22 (二)二者的价值取向不同············································································23 (三)二者的性质定位不同············································································23 (四)二者的程序运作上不同········································································24 五、借鉴法院附设调解制度,重构我国法院调解制度······································

文档评论(0)

chenchend + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档