比较全膝关节置换应用自体血回输引流与传统负压引流：随机对照试验的Meta分析.docVIP

Autologous blood transfusion drainage versus conventional suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liu Jun1, Pan Jian-ke1, Hong Kun-hao2, Xie Hui1, Guo Da1, Xu Shu-chai1 1 Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China 2 Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong Province, China Cite this article: Liu J, Pan JK, Hong KH, Xie H, Guo D, Xu SC. Autologous blood transfusion drainage versus conventional suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu. 2016;20(53):8032-8042. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2016.53.018 ORCID: 0000-0001-5425-8785(Xu Shu-chai) Abstract BACKGROUND: At present, when compared with the conventional suction drainage, the advantages of autologous blood transfusion drainage after total knee arthroplasty have not been clear yet and need evidence of evidence-based medicine to support. OBJECTIVE: Based on the existing evidence of evidence-based medicine, compared with the conventional suction drainage, we evaluated the efficiency, safety, and potential advantages of autologous blood transfusion drainage in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library; all randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of autologous blood transfusion drainage and conventional suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty were included for meta-analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Twelve randomized controlled trials, including 1 119 cases (556 cases for autologous blood transfusion drainage and 563 cases for conventional suction drainage), were identified. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that patients in the autologous blood transf