DK-CRUSH III研究幻灯--张俊杰.pptVIP

Limitations Some kinds of angle restriction should have been applied in the design of the study. We did not include a CABG group to contrast with the stenting techniques. The results were achieved in very high volume operators performing these procedures. It remains unclear whether lower volume centers could reproduce these results. Conclusion Compared to the DK crush, Culotte stenting is associated with significantly increased MACEs in patients with ULMCA bifurcation lesions. DK crush was associated with: less in-stent restenosis of SB less TLR/TVR Thanks for your attention * * * Baseline clinical characteristics were well matched between two treatment groups. * More than 85% enrolled patients were ACS, among them 8% patients was acute MI 2-week from the onset of chest pain to admission. * 70% patients were with 3-vessel disease. 96% lesions belong to Medina Classification 1,1,1. * * left anterior descending artery was treated as main vessel in all patients, with exception for 2 in DK group and 1 in Culotte group, for whom left circumflex was considered as main vessel. * left anterior descending artery was treated as main vessel in all patients, with exception for 2 in DK group and 1 in Culotte group, for whom left circumflex was considered as main vessel. * * left anterior descending artery was treated as main vessel in all patients, with exception for 2 in DK group and 1 in Culotte group, for whom left circumflex was considered as main vessel. * The present study has several limitations. Some kinds of angle restriction should have been applied in the design of the study. Next, we did not include a CABG group to contrast with the stenting techniques. However, the promising results achieved by DK crush technique were comparable with those after CABG. Finally, the results were achieved in very high volume operators performing these procedures. It remains unclear whether lower volume centers could rep