冠心病PCI术后患者相关知识掌握程度及影响因素分析.doc

冠心病PCI术后患者相关知识掌握程度及影响因素分析.doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
冠心病PCI术后患者相关知识掌握程度及影响因素分析

冠心病PCI术后患者相关知识掌握程度及影响因素分析   [摘要] 目的 分析冠心病PCI术后患者相关知识掌握程度及影响因素,给临床医护提供参考。方法 制定调查问卷,随机选取该院2016年1―12月收治的96例冠心病PIC术后患者作为该次调查研究对象,了解患者相关知识的掌握程度,并分析结果影响因素。 结果 PCI患者的认知程度受到多种因素影响,学历从低到高评分为(0.62±0.46)分、(0.81±0.39)分、(1.18±0.60)分、(1.57±0.39)分;年龄越高,认知程度越低下69~80岁评分为(0.67±0.50)分,50~69岁为(1.09±1.41)分,30~50岁为(1.19±0.47)分,18~30岁为(1.23±0.39)分;城镇居民认知为(1.27±0.53)分,高于农村的(0.82±0.48)分。 结论 临床上必须从思想上认识到术后患者相关知识掌握的重要性,同时加强冠心病支架植入术后患者宣教,结合患者情况,选取合理的宣传教学方式,进而实现提高患者健康行为的目的 [关键词] 冠状动脉支架植入术;健康教育;影响因素 [中图分类号] R193 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)04(a)-0082-03 Analysis of Related Knowledge Mastery Degree and Influence Factors of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after PCI Operation LI Yun-jun, LI Ya-nan, QUAN Quan, YUAN Wei-na, JIANG Yong-zheng Department of Cardiology, Jiawang District People’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, 221011 China [Abstract] Objective To analyze the related knowledge mastery degree and influence factors of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI operation and provide reference for the clinical medicine. Methods 96 cases of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI operation admitted and treated in our hospital from January to December 2016 were randomly selected and surveyed by the questionnaires, and the related knowledge mastery degree of patients was known, and the influence factors of results were analyzed. Results The cognitive degree was affected by multiple factors, and the academic level from low to high was respectively (0.62±0.46)points, (0.81±0.39)points, (1.18±0.60)points, (1.57±0.39)points, the higher the age, the lower the cognitive degree, and the score between 69 to 80 was (0.67±0.50), the score between 50 to 69 was (1.09±1.41)points, the score between 30 to 50 was (1.19±0.47)points, the score between 18 to 30 was (1.23±0.39)points, and the cognitive score of urban residents was higher than that of rural residents, [(1.27±0.53)points vs (0.82±0.48)points]. Conclusion In clinic, we must recognize the importance of related

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档