整车音效测试.ppt

Objective result rating Scale 1 to 5 (5 is best) BMW 740LI ALL Speakers ON BMW 740Li Fader front/rear BMW X5 All Speakers ON BMW X5 Fader front/rear Benz E300L All Speakers on Benz E300L fader front/rear Benz S350 All speakers on Benz S350 fader front/rear Lexus 570 All speakers on Lexus 570 fader front/ rear Audi A6 All speakers on Audi A6 Fader front/rear Summary Most of the performance issues in the vehicles tested could be corrected with EQ filter updates The BMW740 had an issue where the low frequencies compressed noticeably at higher volumes, this may be a DSP setting, or problem with the radio software The Mercedes E300L was an entry level system, not in the same class as the other vehicles. It could sound score better with EQ updates but could never approach the 3.5-4.0 rating given the speaker configuration The Audi A6 scored the best, but a system design that relies on the front doors for subwoofers requires extensive design to the door and trim panels to minimize buzzing and rattles, increasing system cost From a practical standpoint, the Mercedes S500 configuration might be the best design to target for a vehicle, and the Lexus 570 for a SUV (since the X5 has integrated floor subwoofers) Visteon Confidential 2011 Chery Audio System Benchmark Testing Report Sun, Lanlan Dage, David 21-Feb-2011 Lanlan, correct spelling BMW 740: Front doors: 100mm midrange Front mirror patch: 25mm tweeters IP: 100mm center speaker Rear doors: 100mm midrange Rear parcel shelf surround speakers Floor under driver seat: 200mm subwoofer Floor under passenger seat: 200mm subwoofer Mid-bass hole in tonal response, was audible in all types of music sources This may be due to the location of the subwoofer (under the seats), and the small 100mm midrange speakers not able to produce much output below 300hz, leaving an area of reduced output Note: this system had a good tonal response and imaging. At louder listening, the low frequencies “compressed”. This configura