劳动者需谨防管理用人单位混淆概念变相侵权(国外英语资料).docVIP

劳动者需谨防管理用人单位混淆概念变相侵权(国外英语资料).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
劳动者需谨防管理用人单位混淆概念变相侵权(国外英语资料)

劳动者需谨防管理用人单位混淆概念变相侵权(国外英语资料) In the process of work, there are always some employers to confuse the concept of “ rdquo in the name of duty; ask the employee to delay work, and delay work is actually “ rdquo or “ overtime duty; ”? Should the unit pay the overtime? In the job market, many workers are puzzled. “ rdquo and “ overtime duty; ” only one word, the relevant rights and obligations of the legal significance is far. Typical case: agreed “ on duty ” clause is not umbrella Worker Wu worked for a company in 2009, and the two sides signed a two-year labor contract, which lasts from May 15, 2009 to May 15, 2011. Wu in the companys position is office clerk, is mainly responsible for the companys comprehensive Department of document processing work. The two sides agreed in the labor contract, Wu work 8 hours a day, the implementation of standard work hours, work 5 days a week. However, the contract also agreed, Wu need every Saturday to the company on duty day, the company in the monthly 5 days ago in the form of currency payment Wu month wages, the monthly salary including Saturdays salary duty. In May 15, 2011, after the expiration of the labor contract with the company, Wu disagreed with the companys request for renewal of the contract and asked the company to pay its overtime every Saturday since May 15, 2009. The company believes that the company to arrange Wu is on duty, but not to work overtime, and the company has been in accordance with the agreement between both parties, the duty paid wages, therefore rejected Wus request, so Wu to resort to arbitration, require the unit to pay overtime. After hearing the case, the arbitration supported Wus request, and the unit refused to accept the ruling and appealed to the court of first instance. After the court of first instance that, according to the case evidence, Wu work every Saturday in is to complete a certain amount of work tasks, rather than work Monday to Friday is no different, is a continuation of his own wo

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档