菜单中的群体决议(国外英语资料).docVIP

菜单中的群体决议(国外英语资料) Two heads are better than one, supposedly by many groups with medium resolution analysis should be able to develop into extraordinary wisdom, but in practice it is unsatisfactory, the resolution of the group are often better than double resolution adventure bureau group, the error rate is greater. In order to meet the already smart ultimate benefit by mutual discussion, why would fail? Multi game game of ordering The two groups together to eat, one is poor, one is poor, the implementation of aa. What kind of food would they order, expensive or cheaper? A companys senior management team is not listed for consultation, everyone will propose a series of questions like: where listed, listed companies can achieve the benefits, which bring negative effects, listed the benefits of what people better, listed the negative impact and will affect what people, what is right my influence...... With two examples of this place is that they are on a group decision results, the necessary resolution of the incident, if people have high resolution into homogeneity, then group resolution is equivalent to group decision. But in practice, the challenge of group decision making is induced into the decision-making of individual is often heterogeneous, which exists between the decision-making process will produce results of group dynamics -- mediated the influence each other in relationship, determined the decision-making process and the Bureau, that is the essence of group decision making. With this order decision behavior, differences in the poor and poor situation, two groups between each other is also different kinetics. The first situation: two people do not understand each others property situation, they think the other side is the same class as me. May I like poor idea, control your food, and a mood of large control. He had at least two possible choices: first, in favor of a concept, some expensive, probably I dont like the food, I wish to hide its poverty, it is mo