管理课件小心视崖.pptVIP

A table Nine children refused to move off the center board. Other 27 children crawled off the board and crossed the glass when their mother called them from the shallow side. Only 3 of them crawled off the board and crossed the glass with great hesitation when their mother called them from the deep side. Human infans cannot be tested prior to six months of age,because they do not have adequate. So gibson and walk decided to test various other animals as a comparison. Criticisms and subsequent research A later study placed younger infants,ages two to five months,on the glass over the deep side.all of the babies showed a decrease in heart rate,it was a sign of interest,for fear is accompanied by heart rate increase Recent applications Berger and adolph cited their study in the research on how toddlers analyze the characteristics of tasks involving heights. Another applications of the study looked at the possibilities for using virtual reality to help developmentally disabled children learn to deal safely with the physical environment around them. conclusion Through the inventiveness of gibson and walk,behavioral scientists have been able to study depth perception in a clear and systematic way. The truth may lie in a compromise that proposes an interraction between nature and nurture. * They believe that depth perception and the avoidance of a drop-off appear automatically as part of our original biological equipment. It’s the products of experience。 The goal of this research is to examine whether depth percetion is learned or innate. The subjects for the study were 36 infants between 6-14months Each infant was placed on the center board of the visual cliff。 Then called by the mother first from the deep side,then from the shallow side. In order to compare the development of depth perception in humans with that in other baby animals,the visual cliff allowed for similar tests with other species(without mothers beckoning) animals gibson and walk pointed out that all