中院再审的律师署理词(国外英文资料).docVIP

  • 5
  • 0
  • 约1.51万字
  • 约 4页
  • 2017-06-27 发布于河南
  • 举报

中院再审的律师署理词(国外英文资料).doc

中院再审的律师署理词(国外英文资料)

中院再审的律师代理词(国外英文资料) The lawyers agent for retrial in the intermediate court Judge: On the basis of lt and civil procedure law; the relevant provisions of law, Chengdu aid law firm commissioned Zhou Yucun, assigned me as its Xingda office and Jintang County debt dispute case agent. As an agent, the following comments are hereby made for the courts reference: I. the facts of the case and the case: first, the agent believes that the original provision of “ business expenses detailed list ” (hereinafter referred to as “ detailed list ”) should be used as the basis for the decision of this case. The reason lies in this “ the detailed list rdquo is objective, unique and authentic. The defendant in the trial of this party is repeatedly list “ ” expressed doubts about the authenticity, but not for the identification, the court also declined to be identified, and put forward effective evidence to the contrary be determined (although they have to show to the court a remark but no text of the list “ ” copy, but can not provide the original, and the copy can be through technical processing means to make remarks text disappear) against the twenty-seventh of the fourth provisions of the original evidence force of the Supreme Peoples Court on civil trial reform of economic problems is greater than a specified came evidence. Therefore, the authenticity of the list is not to be questioned. The “ detailed list ” direct said (reprinted from library , million library network, more than 1 million secretarial templates, free download) The clear legal agent Yi Shouxiang in the plaintiff (cashier) a fact and a spending amount, purpose and specific operating methods, namely “ the single leave cashier cash balance account, set aside a formal invoice by director Yi Shouxiang to recover rdquo (see remark column table). Therefore, the agent considers the ldquo provided by the plaintiff; the detailed list rdquo should be used as the basis for the decision of the case. On the contrary, there

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档