虹吸和直冲式的短长(国外英文资料).docVIP

虹吸和直冲式的利弊(国外英文资料) Give you an analysis of the pros and cons of siphon and direct. Water-saving toilets mandatory national standards has been implemented, but also the growing interest in people of water-saving, water-saving toilet flushing is also not on the intensity of the skeptical. When someone was judging the momentum of the toilet, he used table tennis as an experimental tool, that is to say, whether the toilet could fall into the table tennis table as a standard to measure the momentum. Because table tennis in the water buoyancy is relatively large, with the general straight toilet test, can not all rushed down, can not get better results. And siphon toilet with the siphon effect of water flow, with strong suction, for floating objects on the water relative to the straight toilet, attractive greater, so the experimental effect is better. But this can syphon type toilets on the punching effect than straight into the toilet please? Again, a simple example is that if a wet cloth is thrown into the toilet, a flush toilet will perform better than a siphon toilet. Experts say siphon toilets tend to flush dirt that sticks to the toilet surface, while flush toilet pipes have large diameters and are prone to flush larger dirt. They have their advantages and disadvantages, and they should be considered comprehensively when shopping. 1, balance between water saving and flushing rate However, as the topic of water saving is focused, a new problem has been raised: is it straight or siphon water saving under the premise of ensuring momentum? To this end, the reporter interviewed the product technical manager of weed DC Design Co. Ltd., he pointed out that the dead a toilet is water saving depends on two aspects, one is the dead is a toilet water tank. The difference is the difference between sitting part and siphoned off. In Tacoma and some European brands represented are washdown, using the British design standards, characterized by simple lines flushed, short path, and