专断性医疗行为的刑法评价.pdfVIP

摘要 摘要 专断性医疗行为是指违反充分说明义务或未尽充分说明义务且未经患者同 意或同意无效以及履行了充分说明却未取得患者同意而经行实施的医疗行为， 并且包括紧急医疗行为和强制专断医疗行为。刑法上评价专断性医疗行为不能 一概而论，应该具体问题具体分析。正当的专断性医疗行为要件主要包括医师 实施专断性医疗行为必须符合医疗常规、行为人实施的专断性医疗行为必须符 合医疗目的及其不应该超过必要的限度。因此总结三种具体情形，分别是患者 滥用同意权、紧急医疗以及强制医疗行为。分析被害人承诺、紧急避险、目的 正当以及具体说几种阻却专断性医疗行为违法性的理论，主张适用推定承诺阻 却患方滥用同意权和紧急医疗，适用紧急避险阻却强制医疗。而如何对过当的 专断性医疗行为定性，医疗事故罪和故意伤害罪皆有成立的可能性。 关键词：专断性医疗行为；医疗事故罪；故意伤害罪 I 万方数据 Abstract ABSTRACT Unauthorized medical treatment refers to violations of medical fully illustrated instructions obligations or obligations fully and entirely without patient consent or the consent is invalid and failed to carry out a full description of the patient s consent to obtain medical practices implemented by the line , and includes emergency medical practices and forced arbitrary medical practices . The criminal law on the evaluation of unauthorized medical treatment can not be generalized, it should Case-by-case basis. Unauthorized acts of legitimate medical requirements including medical doctors implementing must meet medical practice, medical arbitrary acts of the perpetrator must be implemented in line with medical purposes and should not exceed the limits of necessity . Therefore concluded three specific situations , namely patient consent rights abuse , emergency medical care and compulsory unauthorized medical behavior. Analysis Victim emergency action , the end justifies and specifically negates some unauthorized