口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变疗效分析.doc

口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变疗效分析.doc

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变疗效分析

口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变疗效分析   【摘要】 目的 探析口腔?M织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变的临床效果。方法 92例Ⅲ°根分叉病变患者作为研究对象, 根据随机分配原则分为观察组与对照组, 各46例。对照组患者接受口腔组织补片治疗, 观察组患者则接受口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗, 对两组临床治疗效果进行对比分析。结果 ①两组患者治疗前患牙探诊出血率对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后3个月, 观察组探诊出血率为(15.34±0.23)%, 对照组探诊出血率为(17.86±0.25)%, 两组探诊出血率均优于治疗前, 且观察组优于对照组, 差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后3个月, 观察组探诊深度为(2.91±0.18)mm, 对照组探诊深度为(3.89±0.26)mm, 两组探诊深度均优于治疗前, 且观察组优于对照组, 差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后3个月, 观察组附着水平为(4.89±0.28)mm, 对照组附着水平为(4.92±0.38)mm, 两组附着水平均优于治疗前(P0.05)。结论 口腔组织补片联合骨粉治疗Ⅲ°根分叉病变的临床效果较为显著, 有促进牙周组织再生的作用 【关键词】 口腔组织补片;骨粉;Ⅲ°根分叉病变;临床效果 DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.09.021 Analysis of curative effect by oral tissue patch combined with bone powder in the treatment of grade Ⅲ furcation defect LI Yan-ru, LI Wei. Medical School of Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512026, China 【Abstract】 Objective To investigate clinical effect by oral tissue patch combined with bone powder in the treatment of grade Ⅲ furcation defect. Methods A total of 92 patients with grade Ⅲ furcation defect as study subjects were divided by random distribution into observation group and control group, with 46 cases in each group. The control group received oral tissue patch for treatment, and the observation group received oral tissue patch combined with bone powder for treatment. Clinical effects in both groups were taken into comparative analysis. Results ① There was no statistically significant difference of bleeding rate in involved teeth probing diagnosis before treatment between the two groups (P0.05). In 3 months after treatment, the observation group had bleeding rate in probing diagnosis as (15.34±0.23)%, which was (17.86±0.25)% in the control group. Both groups had better bleeding rate in probing diagnosis than those before treatment, and the observation group had better rate than the control group. Their differences all had statistical significance (P0.05). In 3 months after treatment, the observation group had probing diagnosis depth as (2.91±0.18) mm, which was (3.89±0.

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档