- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
天然快速去痘印,重现光滑无暇肌肤
Targets for the SG 13 Caracas Meeting Question 4/13 Broadband and IP Related Resource Management Issue -- AAL2 Resource Mgmt (D111, D112, D144) “Burstiness” of AAL2 connections strongly impacts link utilisation for a given delay quantile. For a fixed delay quantile, utilisation decreases with increasing burst size. “Shaping” can be used to control bursts, increase utilization Connection admission control must be based on AAL2 link characteristics (ALC) that describe traffic burstiness Expected Results -- New I.371 Text on AAL2 RM (Developed jointly with Q2/13) Q4/13 will also progress work on Draft Rec. Y.iptc (Traffic Control and Resource Management in IP-Based Networks) Question 6/13Performance of IP-Based Networks and the Emerging Global Information Infrastructure Issue -- IP Packet Transfer QOS Parameters, Objectives New parameter (e.g., SESIP) to specify packet loss clustering Metric(s) and objectives for IP packet delay variation (jitter) Delay specifications for long complex paths IP network Hypothetical Reference Paths, allocation rules Possible new Recommendation on QOS at the TCP layer Expected Result -- Stable Y.1541, Revision for Y.1540 IP/MM Workshop recommended Joint Meeting (SGs 13, 16, 12, 11) to harmonize QOS Classes Question 7/13B-ISDN/ATM Cell Transfer and Availability Performance Issue -- Rec. I.356 performance allocation models ATM/ADSL access links, ATM/IP Interworking (D138) Use of inter-operator (rather than country-based) network models (TD11) Expected Results: Proposed new performance models and allocation methods Question 8/13Transmission Error and Availability Performance Issue -- “G.optperf” allocation model (D101) Proposal: Change international paths to multi-operator paths crossing international borders Questions: Should fixed G.828 “terminating country” block allowance (17.5%) be allocated to “terminating domain”? Should the “routing factor” for the terminating domain be copied from G.828? How many
文档评论(0)