- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression
Languages
Deirdre Mulligan and Aaron Burstein
Abstract
Rights expression languages (RELs) seek to provide the vocabulary and grammar necessary to express fine-grained, ex ante rules controlling the use of digital works. Drafters of RELs claim to search for a generic, content-neutral language to support expressions of rights in digital objects in a broad range of contexts. Generally modeled on access control languages, RELs are structured predominantly as permission languages - meaning that no rights exist in an object until they are affirmatively and specifically granted.
Simply put, current RELs reduce the expression of legal rights which may be: a) given by the objects owner, b) conveyed clearly by a legal instrument, or c) asserted by the individual (and reviewed after the fact for legal validity); to the granting of permissions by the owner/rights holder of the digital object. Theoretically it is possible for a third-party (government) or the user to grant rights, however it is difficult to imagine either occurring for a mix of political and practical reasons. We acknowledge that the term rights in RELs encompasses more than legal rights. Nevertheless, when implemented to manage copyrighted works the rights defined in RELs will have the practical effect of supplanting legal rights. Thus in the context of copyrights, RELs and the DRMs in which they are deployed will replace the balance of rights holders and users rights with self-enforcing, machine readable rule sets reflecting the desires of copyright holders exclusively.
The exclusivity likely to result from existing RELs and DRM is in contrast with the myriad limitations on exclusivity in the Copyright Act. To the extent DRM systems supplant the existing copyright rules with machine enforced licenses defined by copyright holders they will alter the copyright balance in the direction of copyright holder exclusivity.
If RELs are to be agnostic as t
文档评论(0)