- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料
GRE作文范文 GRE作文issue写作范文+翻译
新GRE作文复习,需要选择一些优秀的新GRE作文范文来当做复习
材料,进行学习新GRE作文写法和模拟的样本。下面为大家介绍一篇新
GRE写作范文,帮助大家复习新GRE作文,获得理想的新GRE作文分数
。
In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by
the University of Leeville, most respondents said they preferred
literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study
conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book
most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in
Leeville was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded
that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their
reading habits.
This argument is based on two separate surveys of the
citizens of Leeville, conducted by the University of Leeville. In the
first survey, most respondents said that their preferred reading
material was literary classics. A follow-up study by the same
researchers found that mystery novels were the most frequently
checked out books from each of the public libraries in Leeville.
The arguer concludes that the respondents in the first study
therefore misrepresented their own reading habits. This
argument does not follow the facts and is therefore
unconvincing due to several flaws in logic.
First of all, it is possible that none of the citizens who
responded to the first survey were participants in the second
survey. Statistically speaking, it is entirely possible that the first
survey contained a greater majority of literary classics readers
than are present in the general population of Leeville. The
difference in the first study and the study of the books that were
actually checked out from the library may purely be that the
respondents had different interests in literature, therefore
disallowing the arguers conclusion that the first group
misrepresented its preferred reading material.
Secondly, it is possible that the difference in the survey
results could be attributed to the lack of availability of li
原创力文档


文档评论(0)