脚踏实地,锐意创新,探索规律（Be down-to-earth, innovative, and explore the law）.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约7.4千字
约 6页
2017-07-22 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

脚踏实地,锐意创新,探索规律（Be down-to-earth, innovative, and explore the law）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

脚踏实地,锐意创新,探索规律（Be down-to-earth, innovative, and explore the law）

脚踏实地,锐意创新,探索规律（Be down-to-earth, innovative, and explore the law） Be down-to-earth, innovative, and explore the law (postscript) Contributions of this seminar is still very active, received a total of 127 papers from 81 universities and research will be sent. The Council meeting comments by reviewers, one by one vote, and give the suggestions, please carefully consider the author, send China jiaokewenwei body union national committee review, to determine the final 62 papers submitted by 54 colleges in the set. Now that the number of papers and papers submitted is unprecedented, why did you only earn 62? The problem lies in the quality of the communication. Although there are some contributions in high quality work, however, vague no, nothing new for many. People often say, our seminars are better and better.. If this is a direction, is undoubtedly correct; if this refers to the conduct of business, if this is also fully deserve; this is refers to the quality, beg to differ. We can compare this book with the first five episodes of the series, and we can clearly find that in some ways, it does make progress. In some ways, it seems to be stepping down, but some are not as good as before. Relatively speaking, its easy to start, and its much harder to keep improving. Our research and writing seems to have entered a bottleneck status Results no self-made, 62 papers are included in the read, you will find many flash things. In the light of the Councils views, we are focusing only on the four problems in the text: First, the lack of new ideas New idea is the first principle for the examination. There is an article entitled correct view, rigorous structure, clear logic and fluent writing, but failed to be selected. The reason is that the text is well known and has already been told. Why should others listen to you again? As the saying goes, dull remarks died. To write, it must be different from the previous one! This different can not so large, can not perfect, and even allo