亚细亚社会（Asiatic society）.docVIP

亚细亚社会（Asiatic society） Asiatic society Help edit an encyclopedia The Asian society is characterized by the lack of private property, the states control over irrigation works, the self-sufficiency of the village, the combination of handicraft industry and agriculture, and the singleness of the mode of production. Lack of private wealth is the basic cause of stagnation in asia. It raises two basic questions: first, the whole question of the relationship between man and nature; and second, whether it is possible to have such a society. The Asian mode of production (AMP) is often useful in replacing the linear phases of development theory. As a matter of fact, the problem of Asian society is much more profound than the technical problems raised. The Asian society must be seen as a central element in the Orientalism tradition, a powerful and destructive resilience prevalent in Western Philosophy (BST). Asia Society (Asiatic Society) although considered in the analysis of the Asiatic Society in nineteenth Century is not Marx and Engels in the theory and experience of the center, but the nature of Asia Society, or more scientifically, the Asiatic mode of production (hereinafter referred to as AMP) after Marx had shown the important significance in theory and politically. The problems caused by the debate about the AMP, not only relates to the Marx doctrine in Europe outside of things development thought, and relates to the materialism explanation of class society, the revolutionary transformation of world history and the nature of the problem. According to an obvious two difficult reasoning, it can show the dispute about the concept of Asian society. If you recognize a social and economic characteristics of Asia Society, as usual in conformity with the relevant historical teleology envisaged arrangement (slavery and feudal system, capitalism and socialism) may not apply. However, in recognizing the rationality of AMP, Marx may still place western history in the position of