iges破面修补（iges破面修补）.docVIP

iges破面修补（iges破面修补） For the IGES file at the input to the UG method in arrancar repair Basically, there are two ways of dealing with it, One is that the input for the IGES model of local connection with some minor defects, interference, intersection, UG provides an automatic repair tool, specifically, select Export - Heal Geometry in model input, pay attention to the choice of tolerancede (tiny, Analysis Examine Geometry, in the first check model) then, it specifies the output file name can be, the output is a patched PRT file, open the repair PRT file OK. The second is that without these problems for IGES model input, select Import - IGES - Modify - Settings Advanced Settings, OK Automatic Sewing of in Surfaces phase selection before the tick. Of course, for some other software to build the digital model into a IGES file, if the input to the UG interference, intersection, the defect is too large, and then only manual finishing Comparison of proe and UG Release date: 2005-9-15 20:03:04 Author: aqun source: this site original I as a professional automotive mould CAD/CAM engineer, proficient in several foreign CAD/CAM software, I think UG is mainly suitable for large cars, aircraft factory establish complex mathematical model, and PRO/E is mainly suitable for small and medium enterprises quickly establish a relatively simple mathematical model. In the more complex modeling, it is often no parameter is useful, I generally use PRO/E to start a relatively simple line frame, curved surface, and then go to UG inside the advanced surface of the establishment, chamfering. Most of the parameters have been deleted because of repeated changes to the product. The two software has its own advantages, and it should be mixed modeling to achieve the best results. When the parts are larger and more complex, the processing is done in UG, Cimatron, roughing and UG finishing. Comparison two, I have been using Pro/E for several years, recently in learning UG. Ive always felt that the